These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19371308)
21. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer. Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D; Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk of cervical cancer subsequent to a positive screening cytology: follow-up study in Finland. Viikki M; Pukkala E; Hakama M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 10929958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical carcinoma in Surinam. Incidence and staging of cervical carcinoma between 1989 and 1994. Krul EJ; Peters LA; Vandenbroucke JP; Vrede A; van Kanten RW; Fleuren GJ Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(7):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8608511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of prognostic and socio-economic factors in screen-detected and symptomatic cases of breast cancer. Garvican L; Littlejohns P Public Health; 1998 Jan; 112(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9490883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Invasive cervical cancer audit: why cancers developed in a high-risk population with an organised screening programme. Herbert A; Anshu ; Culora G; Dunsmore H; Gupta SS; Holdsworth G; Kubba AA; McLean E; Sim J; Raju KS BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 20184570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing. Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Linear trend analysis of patients with cervical cancer treated at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina in 2001-2007. Nincic D; Mandic A; Dugandzija T; Zivaljevic M; Rajovic J; Vojinovic D J BUON; 2009; 14(4):669-72. PubMed ID: 20148460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical impact of quality assurance in an organized cervical screening program. Andrae B; Smith P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 May; 78(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 10326890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Descriptive epidemiology of vaginal cancer incidence and survival by race, ethnicity, and age in the United States. Wu X; Matanoski G; Chen VW; Saraiya M; Coughlin SS; King JB; Tao XG Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(10 Suppl):2873-82. PubMed ID: 18980291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histopathologic subtyping of cervical adenocarcinoma reveals increasing incidence rates of endometrioid tumors in all age groups: a population based study with review of all nonsquamous cervical carcinomas in Norway from 1966 to 1970, 1976 to 1980, and 1986 to 1990. Alfsen GC; Thoresen SO; Kristensen GB; Skovlund E; Abeler VM Cancer; 2000 Sep; 89(6):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11002225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Diagnosis and treatment of invasive cervical cancer in Cambodia (apropos of 35 cases)]. Monchy D; Lieng CR; Kruy LS; Kahler K; Eav S Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2005 Sep; 98(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 16267957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A 13-year follow-up of patients with breast cancer presenting to a District General Hospital breast unit in southeast England. Robinson D; Bell J; Møller H; Salman A Breast; 2006 Apr; 15(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 16081289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimation of the duration of the preclinical phase of cervical adenocarcinoma suggests that there is ample opportunity for screening. Plaxe SC; Saltzstein SL Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Oct; 75(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10502426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan. Ioka A; Tsukuma H; Ajiki W; Oshima A Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 35(8):464-9. PubMed ID: 16006573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes among women younger than age 40 in a state breast cancer screening program. Vetto JT; Wheeler AJ; Toomey M; Schmidt KJ Am J Surg; 2006 May; 191(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 16647351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evolving a strategic approach to cervical cancer control in Africa. Adewole IF; Benedet JL; Crain BT; Follen M Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S209-12. PubMed ID: 16202445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relation between the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and the screening interval: is a five year interval too long? Herbert A; Stein K; Bryant TN; Breen C; Old P J Med Screen; 1996; 3(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 8946309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of the National Cervical Screening Programme on the presentation of cancer of the cervix in Canterbury. Simcock B; Sykes P; Laney M N Z Med J; 2001 Aug; 114(1138):378-80. PubMed ID: 11589435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of causes of increased incidence of cervical cancer in Slovenia. Smrkolj S; Rakar S; Mozina A; Erzen M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 15541860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interval breast cancer: is it a different type of breast cancer? Raja MA; Hubbard A; Salman AR Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 14965568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]