390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19373069)
1. The Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006) and constitutional civil rights in the United States.
Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 May; 37(5):1830; author reply 1830. PubMed ID: 19373069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): new challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities.
Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2007 Sep; 2():19. PubMed ID: 17850664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making use of the Patient Self-Determination Act.
Burton LA; Yellen SB; Elpern E
Christ Century; 1992 Jun 17-24; 109(20):616-8. PubMed ID: 15999429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Respecting patients' rights at the end of life: problems with the 2006 Uniform Anatomical Gift Act.
Greer DM
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):372-3. PubMed ID: 19112314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Our bodies, our families. The family's role in organ donation.
Dougherty CJ
Second Opin; 1993 Oct; 19(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 10129972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Organ donation, patients' rights, and medical responsibilities at the end of life.
Iltis AS; Rie MA; Wall A
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):310-5. PubMed ID: 19050624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilizing the bodies of the dead.
Quay PM
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Aug; 28(4):889-927. PubMed ID: 12186064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The constitutional implications of human cloning.
Foley EP
Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking the Patient Self Determination Act: implementation without effectiveness.
Collins SE
J Nurs Law; 1999 Nov; 6(3):29-46. PubMed ID: 16285128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Death in pregnancy--an American tragedy.
Ecker JL
N Engl J Med; 2014 Mar; 370(10):889-91. PubMed ID: 24499176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An Oklahoma perspective: end of life decision-making and termination of treatment.
Burkett TM; Weyrauch S
Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):565-81. PubMed ID: 16273679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The physician and the mentally incompetent patient. What changes do the new adult patient protection right bring?].
Hochmann FM; Martin-Achard P
Rev Med Suisse; 2013 Oct; 9(400):1791-3. PubMed ID: 24187754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act: an analysis.
Sutton EC
Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 10104767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing consent for organ donation: mandated choice, individual autonomy, and informed consent.
Cotter H
Health Matrix Clevel; 2011; 21(2):599-626. PubMed ID: 22145526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advance medical directives and the role of the church.
House DM
Christ Century; 1991 Dec; 108(35):1137-9. PubMed ID: 16127871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives and the persistent vegetative state in Victoria: a human rights perspective.
Porter D
J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 16304765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developments in the law. Medical technology and the law.
Harv Law Rev; 1990 May; 103(7):1519-676. PubMed ID: 10106697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Questions arising in implementing federal patient self-determination requirements.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1991 Sep; 8(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 10114046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protecting patient self-determination. New legislation requires healthcare providers to inform patients of rights regarding advance directives.
Miles J
Health Prog; 1991 Apr; 72(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 10109965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Denounce demagoguery on directives!
Manthous C
Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):1014-5; author reply 1015-6. PubMed ID: 20168176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
