These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19374240)

  • 1. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
    Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.
    Goonewardene RW; Goonewardene MS; Razza JM; Murray K
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19113071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times.
    Gracco A; Buranello M; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 18030371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J; Gillgrass T; Mossey P
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches.
    Lee SP; Delong R; Hodges JS; Hayashi K; Lee JB
    Clin Anat; 2008 Jan; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18092365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of 3-dimensional tooth crown size in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Akcam MO; Toygar TU; Ozer L; Ozdemir B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18617107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment using a low cost 3D laser scanner for dental anatomy capturing.
    Alcañiz M; Grau V; Monserrat C; Juan C; Albalat S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():8-14. PubMed ID: 10538404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A method of dental arch auto-detection for dental plaster models].
    Wang Q; Dai N; Hao G; Yu Q; Liao W; Sun Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 26(4):721-4, 730. PubMed ID: 19813596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally.
    Hayasaki H; Martins RP; Gandini LG; Saitoh I; Nonaka K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 16027637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.