These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19374240)

  • 21. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
    Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tooth width and arch dimensions in normal and malocclusion samples: an odontometric study.
    Hashim HA; Al-Ghamdi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):36-51. PubMed ID: 15915203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models.
    Reuschl RP; Heuer W; Stiesch M; Wenzel D; Dittmer MP
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital treatment objectives: procedure and clinical application.
    Garino F; Garino GB
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 15546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems.
    Favero L; Terrazzani C; Favero V; Stellini E; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 20545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional computer-assisted study model analysis of long-term oral-appliance wear. Part 2. Side effects of oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnea patients.
    Chen H; Lowe AA; de Almeida FR; Fleetham JA; Wang B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):408-17. PubMed ID: 18774087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simple mathematical study of anterior dental relations: Part I.
    Cordato MA
    Aust Orthod J; 1995 Mar; 13(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 8975663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
    Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationship between the curve of Spee and dentofacial morphology evaluated with a 3-dimensional reconstruction method in Korean adults.
    Cheon SH; Park YH; Paik KS; Ahn SJ; Hayashi K; Yi WJ; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e7-14. PubMed ID: 18456135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Royal London space analysis: plaster versus digital model assessment.
    Grewal B; Lee RT; Zou L; Johal A
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 27511915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
    Abizadeh N; Moles DR; O'Neill J; Noar JH
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies.
    Grünheid T; Patel N; De Felippe NL; Wey A; Gaillard PR; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 24485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.
    Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Miasiro Junior H; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.