These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19374786)

  • 1. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].
    Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
    Liu JP; Xia Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Manns B; Laupland KB; Doig CJ
    Crit Care; 2005 Oct; 9(5):R575-82. PubMed ID: 16277721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
    Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 11091231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.
    Cornelius VR; Perrio MJ; Shakir SA; Smith LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 19757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of acupuncture-moxibustion in China].
    Xiong J; Du YH; Li B; Shi L; Xu YY; Liu Q; Tian TT; Liu WH; Fu Y
    Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2009 Sep; 29(9):763-8. PubMed ID: 19803250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM Statement].
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10918802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Appraisal of meta-analysis manuscripts on eye diseases published in Chinese journals with QUOROM statement and MOOSE guidelines].
    Zhu MM; Zou HD
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 47(8):732-7. PubMed ID: 22169614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Lotrionte M; Abbate A; Testa L; Remigi E; Burzotta F; Valgimigli M; Romagnoli E; Crea F; Agostoni P
    BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7535):202-9. PubMed ID: 16415336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis for reporting quality of Chinese meta-analysis on stomatology].
    Li CJ; Lü J; Su NC; Li S; Shi ZD
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 May; 46(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 21733375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.