BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19375009)

  • 1. Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.
    Kaban LB; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Yeshwant K; Padwa BL; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):996-1008. PubMed ID: 19375009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular deformities: single-vector distraction techniques for a multivector problem.
    Singh DJ; Glick PH; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1468-72. PubMed ID: 19816280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Curvilinear mandibular distraction results and long-term stability effects in a group of 40 patients.
    Aizenbud D; Hazan-Molina H; Thimmappa B; Hopkins EM; Schendel SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 20517103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous correction of bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with mandibular micrognathia using internal distraction osteogenesis and 3-dimensional craniomaxillofacial models.
    Feiyun P; Wei L; Jun C; Xin X; Zhuojin S; Fengguo Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 68(3):571-7. PubMed ID: 19954874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in very young patients to correct airway obstruction.
    Denny AD; Talisman R; Hanson PR; Recinos RF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Aug; 108(2):302-11. PubMed ID: 11496167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The treatment of mandibular micrognathia secondary to temporomandibular joint ankylosis with distraction osteogenesis].
    Liang C; Wang X; Yi B; Li ZL; Wang XX
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 28(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 23520775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
    Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Gateno J; Everett P; White CL; Kikinis R; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 15742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis: comparison of treatment with transport distraction osteogenesis or the matthews device arthroplasty.
    Gabbay JS; Heller JB; Song YY; Wasson KL; Harrington H; Bradley JP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):516-22. PubMed ID: 16770191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.
    Roth DA; Gosain AK; McCarthy JG; Stracher MA; Lefton DR; Grayson BH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1237-47; discussion 1248-50. PubMed ID: 9105350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical experience with the application of distraction osteogenesis for airway obstruction.
    Genecov DG; Barceló CR; Steinberg D; Trone T; Sperry E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1817-21. PubMed ID: 19816357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of curvilinear mandible distraction using 3-dimensional computer-simulated modeling.
    Bastidas N; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1713-6. PubMed ID: 23147330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical guide assistant mandibular distraction osteogenesis and sagittal split osteotomy in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Shi L; Liu W; Yin L; Feng S; Xu S; Zhang ZY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):498-500. PubMed ID: 25699536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chronic temporomandibular joint dislocation by mandibular distraction in a patient with Melnick-needles syndrome.
    Kelley P; Mata C; Da Silveira A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):174-6. PubMed ID: 20072009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular growth after distraction in patients under 48 months of age.
    Hollier LH; Kim JH; Grayson B; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Apr; 103(5):1361-70. PubMed ID: 10190432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distraction osteogenesis for tracheostomy dependent children with severe micrognathia.
    Rachmiel A; Srouji S; Emodi O; Aizenbud D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):459-63. PubMed ID: 22421840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Versatility of uniplanar prearthoplastic distraction osteogenesis in the correction of post-ankylosis facial deformities-a report of five different cases.
    Andrade NN; Aggarwal N; Mathai P; Nerurkar S
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 22(4):463-474. PubMed ID: 30203137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging the neonatal mandible for accurate distraction osteogenesis.
    Katzen JT; Holliday RA; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 12(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 11314184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Range of curvilinear distraction devices required for treatment of mandibular deformities.
    Ritter L; Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Kaban LB; Gateno J; Keeve E; Kikinis R; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 16413898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.