198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19375612)
1. Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.
Regenbogen SE; Greenberg CC; Resch SC; Kollengode A; Cima RR; Zinner MJ; Gawande AA
Surgery; 2009 May; 145(5):527-35. PubMed ID: 19375612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of routine radiographs after emergent open cavity operations.
Dossett LA; Dittus RS; Speroff T; May AK; Cotton BA
Surgery; 2008 Aug; 144(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 18656641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of the bioengineered surgical sponge.
Asiyanbola B
Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 23079944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial.
Greenberg CC; Diaz-Flores R; Lipsitz SR; Regenbogen SE; Mulholland L; Mearn F; Rao S; Toidze T; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 18362623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The retained surgical sponge.
Kaiser CW; Friedman S; Spurling KP; Slowick T; Kaiser HA
Ann Surg; 1996 Jul; 224(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8678622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments.
Hariharan D; Lobo DN
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 Mar; 95(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23484986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Radiofrequency Technology to Prevent Retained Sponges and Improve Patient Outcomes.
Primiano M; Sparks D; Murphy J; Glaser K; McNett M
AORN J; 2020 Oct; 112(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 32990961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of five strategies for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: a systematic review with economic modelling.
Brown TJ; Hooper L; Elliott RA; Payne K; Webb R; Roberts C; Rostom A; Symmons D
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Oct; 10(38):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-183. PubMed ID: 17018227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retained surgical sponges: what the practicing clinician should know.
Sakorafas GH; Sampanis D; Lappas C; Papantoni E; Christodoulou S; Mastoraki A; Safioleas M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2010 Nov; 395(8):1001-7. PubMed ID: 20652587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The retained surgical sponge, an ongoing surgical problem].
Keeman JN
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Feb; 146(6):245-6. PubMed ID: 11865651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel Computer-Aided Diagnosis Software for the Prevention of Retained Surgical Items.
Yamaguchi S; Soyama A; Ono S; Hamauzu S; Yamada M; Fukuda T; Hidaka M; Tsurumoto T; Uetani M; Eguchi S
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Dec; 233(6):686-696. PubMed ID: 34592404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Retained Foreign Objects in Upper Extremity Surgical Procedures With Incisions of Two Centimeters or Smaller.
Tofte JN; Caldwell LS
Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():189-192. PubMed ID: 28852356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
