301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19375954)
1. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.
Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.
Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonography with rectal iodine tagging: Feasibility and comparison with oral tagging in a colorectal cancer screening population.
Neri E; Mantarro A; Faggioni L; Scalise P; Bemi P; Pancrazi F; D'Ippolito G; Bartolozzi C
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1701-7. PubMed ID: 26032131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing.
Buccicardi D; Grosso M; Caviglia I; Gastaldo A; Carbone S; Neri E; Bartolozzi C; Quadri P
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 20959977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation.
Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H
Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial.
Utano K; Takayanagi D; Nagata K; Aizawa M; Endo S; Nemoto T; Nemoto D; Isohata N; Lefor AK; Togashi K
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5236-5246. PubMed ID: 30903329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomographic colonography with a reduced dose of laxative using a novel barium sulfate contrast agent in Japan.
Mitsuzaki K; Iinuma G; Morimoto T; Miyake M; Tomimatsu H
Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):245-254. PubMed ID: 30554302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.
Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Plumb A; Boone D; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1477-86. PubMed ID: 24817084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Pot D; Peringa J; Bipat S; Florie J; van Gelder RE; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 18562740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Lamazza A; Schillaci A; Sinibaldi G; Murakami T; Sammartino P; Hori M; Piacentini F; Nofroni I; Stipa V; Passariello R
Gastroenterology; 2004 Nov; 127(5):1300-11. PubMed ID: 15520999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging.
Perry E; Moore H; Reeve J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 30785667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea.
Kim YS; Kim N; Kim SH; Park MJ; Lim SH; Yim JY; Cho KR; Kim SS; Kim DH; Eun HW; Cho KS; Kim JH; Choi BI; Jung HC; Song IS; Shin CS; Cho SH; Oh BH
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):791-8. PubMed ID: 18580500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal polyps on portal phase contrast-enhanced CT colonography: lesion attenuation and distinction from tagged feces.
Lee SS; Park SH; Choi EK; Kim SY; Kim MJ; Lee KH; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17579149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia.
Taylor SA; Bomanji JB; Manpanzure L; Robinson C; Groves AM; Dickson J; Papathanasiou ND; Greenhalgh R; Ell PJ; Halligan S
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 20484420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
