128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19376571)
1. Patterns, art, and context: Donald Floyd Gleason and the development of the Gleason grading system.
Phillips JL; Sinha AA
Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 19376571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dr. Donald Floyd Gleason's historic, immense contribution to urologic pathology.
Filosa A; Fabiani A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2009 Apr; 31(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 19402390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Donald Gleason and the grading of prostate cancer.
MacKenzie R
J Insur Med; 2009; 41(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 19518000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Historical and contemporary perspectives on cribriform morphology in prostate cancer.
Truong M; Frye T; Messing E; Miyamoto H
Nat Rev Urol; 2018 Aug; 15(8):475-482. PubMed ID: 29713007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation between histologic grading and prognosis of prostatic cancer--comparing the grading system of the Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer with Gleason's grading].
Hioki T; Sugimura Y; Sakurai M; Hayashi N; Tochigi H; Kawamura J; Yatani R
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):921-6. PubMed ID: 2239593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.
Shah RB; Zhou M
Pathol Int; 2016 May; 66(5):260-72. PubMed ID: 26991008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience with Gleason histopathologic grading of prostatic cancer in Japan.
Nemoto R; Uchida K; Harada M; Koiso K; Abe R; Kato T
Urology; 1987 Nov; 30(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 3672676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Gleason patterns 3 and 4 prostate cancer represent separate disease states?
Lavery HJ; Droller MJ
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1667-75. PubMed ID: 22998919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis by the ratio of cathepsin B to stefin A in patients with prostate carcinoma.
Sinha AA; Quast BJ; Wilson MJ; Fernandes ET; Reddy PK; Ewing SL; Gleason DF
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 94(12):3141-9. PubMed ID: 12115346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Gleason's system and pelvic lymphadenectomy in the pretherapeutic evaluation of cancer of the prostate. Apropos of 85 cases].
Luciani L; Coccarelli F; Pusiol T; Piscioli F
J Urol (Paris); 1988; 94(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 3392408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The History of Urology at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Lane G; Uloko M; Narayan V; J J Ercole C
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():7-11. PubMed ID: 30248352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in prostate cancer grading: Including a new patient-centric grading system.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2016 Apr; 76(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 26709152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.
Brimo F; Montironi R; Egevad L; Erbersdobler A; Lin DW; Nelson JB; Rubin MA; van der Kwast T; Amin M; Epstein JI
Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):892-901. PubMed ID: 23092544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
