These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19376824)

  • 1. FDR made easy in differential feature discovery and correlation analyses.
    Ling XB; Cohen H; Jin J; Lau I; Schilling J
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 25(11):1461-2. PubMed ID: 19376824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ExactFDR: exact computation of false discovery rate estimate in case-control association studies.
    Wojcik J; Forner K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2407-8. PubMed ID: 18662924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional genomics and proteomics in the clinical neurosciences: data mining and bioinformatics.
    Phan JH; Quo CF; Wang MD
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 158():83-108. PubMed ID: 17027692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RankProd: a bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis.
    Hong F; Breitling R; McEntee CW; Wittner BS; Nemhauser JL; Chory J
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(22):2825-7. PubMed ID: 16982708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments.
    Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. fdrtool: a versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates.
    Strimmer K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 24(12):1461-2. PubMed ID: 18441000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene Ontology analysis in multiple gene clusters under multiple hypothesis testing framework.
    Zhong S; Xie D
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Oct; 41(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 17913480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.