110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19377197)
1. A comparative study of monoscopic and stereoscopic display for a probe-positioning task.
Wang G; Mercier L; Collins DL; Cooperstock JR
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():417-9. PubMed ID: 19377197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Discrepancy between surgeon's binocular parallax perception and manipulation in the neurosurgical operation].
Kato A; Hirata M; Yoshimine T; Tamura S; Kishino F; Hayakawa T
No Shinkei Geka; 1998 Jun; 26(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 9635304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dextrous and shared interaction with medical data: stereoscopic vision is more important than hand-image collocation.
Waterworth JA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():560-6. PubMed ID: 15458152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual accommodation and subject performance during a stereographic object task using liquid crystal shutters.
Miyao M; Ishihara SY; Saito S; Kondo TA; Sakakibara H; Toyoshima H
Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1294-309. PubMed ID: 8888641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change Blindness Phenomena for Virtual Reality Display Systems.
Steinicke F; Bruder G; Hinrichs K; Willemsen P
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2011 Sep; 17(9):1223-33. PubMed ID: 21301028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The DextroBeam: a stereoscopic presentation system for volumetric medical data.
Serra L; Kockro R; Goh LC; Ng H; Lee EC
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():478-84. PubMed ID: 15458136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of binocular stereopsis on surgical manipulation performance and fatigue when using a stereoscopic endoscope.
Yamauchi Y; Shinohara K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():611-4. PubMed ID: 15718808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The right view from the wrong location: depth perception in stereoscopic multi-user virtual environments.
Pollock B; Burton M; Kelly JW; Gilbert S; Winer E
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):581-8. PubMed ID: 22402685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display.
Wentink M; Jakimowicz JJ; Vos LM; Meijer DW; Wieringa PA
Surg Endosc; 2002 Aug; 16(8):1237-41. PubMed ID: 11984691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task.
Sollenberger RL; Milgram P
Hum Factors; 1993 Sep; 35(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 8244411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An interactive stereoscopic display for cooperative work--volume visualization and manipulation with multiple users.
Kitamura Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():261-3. PubMed ID: 16404057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a character posture model on the communication of affect in an immersive virtual environment.
Vinayagamoorthy V; Steed A; Slater M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2008; 14(5):965-82. PubMed ID: 18599911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for the selective attention mechanism and dual-task interference.
Liu CC; Doong JL; Hsu CC; Huang WS; Jeng MC
Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 19166992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tactile feedback exceeds visual feedback to display tissue slippage in a laparoscopic grasper.
Westebring-van der Putten EP; Lysen WW; Henssen VD; Koopmans N; Goossens RH; van den Dobbelsteen JJ; Dankelman J; Jakimowcz J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():420-5. PubMed ID: 19377198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collaborative biomedical data exploration in distributed virtual environments.
Kuester F; He Z; Kimball J; Antonijuan Tresens M; Quintos M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():259-62. PubMed ID: 15718740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of actual human size display and stereoscopic presentation on users' sense of being together with and of psychological immersion in a virtual character.
Ahn D; Seo Y; Kim M; Kwon JH; Jung Y; Ahn J; Lee D
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2014 Jul; 17(7):483-7. PubMed ID: 24606057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Presence and emotions in virtual environments: the influence of stereoscopy.
Baños RM; Botella C; Rubió I; Quero S; García-Palacios A; Alcañiz M
Cyberpsychol Behav; 2008 Feb; 11(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18275306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of immersion on visual analysis of volume data.
Laha B; Sensharma K; Schiffbauer JD; Bowman DA
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 22402687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand.
Ellis SR; Menges BM
Presence (Camb); 1997 Aug; 6(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 11540610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery.
Hubber JW; Taffinder N; Russell RC; Darzi A
Ergonomics; 2003 Aug; 46(10):999-1016. PubMed ID: 12850936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
