These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19378277)

  • 1. Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects.
    Liljeström M; Hultén A; Parkkonen L; Salmelin R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1845-56. PubMed ID: 19378277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and magnetoencephalography evoked responses yield different neural functionality in reading.
    Vartiainen J; Liljeström M; Koskinen M; Renvall H; Salmelin R
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 31(3):1048-58. PubMed ID: 21248130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity.
    Liljeström M; Stevenson C; Kujala J; Salmelin R
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():75-87. PubMed ID: 26169324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing.
    McDonald CR; Thesen T; Carlson C; Blumberg M; Girard HM; Trongnetrpunya A; Sherfey JS; Devinsky O; Kuzniecky R; Dolye WK; Cash SS; Leonard MK; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):707-17. PubMed ID: 20620212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction between Scene and Object Processing Revealed by Human fMRI and MEG Decoding.
    Brandman T; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7700-7710. PubMed ID: 28687603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency and similarity of MEG- and fMRI-signal time courses during movie viewing.
    Lankinen K; Saari J; Hlushchuk Y; Tikka P; Parkkonen L; Hari R; Koskinen M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():361-369. PubMed ID: 29486325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():441-454. PubMed ID: 28716718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Ou W; Nummenmaa A; Golland P; Hamalainen MS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1926-9. PubMed ID: 19964568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI.
    Garcés P; Pereda E; Hernández-Tamames JA; Del-Pozo F; Maestú F; Pineda-Pardo JÁ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 26503502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining fMRI and MEG increases the reliability of presurgical language localization: a clinical study on the difference between and congruence of both modalities.
    Grummich P; Nimsky C; Pauli E; Buchfelder M; Ganslandt O
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1793-803. PubMed ID: 16889984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy analysis of fMRI and MEG activations determined by intraoperative mapping.
    Ellis DG; White ML; Hayasaka S; Warren DE; Wilson TW; Aizenberg MR
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Feb; 48(2):E13. PubMed ID: 32006951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarity-Based Fusion of MEG and fMRI Reveals Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Human Cortex During Visual Object Recognition.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D; Oliva A
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Aug; 26(8):3563-3579. PubMed ID: 27235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatiotemporal activity of a cortical network for processing visual motion revealed by MEG and fMRI.
    Ahlfors SP; Simpson GV; Dale AM; Belliveau JW; Liu AK; Korvenoja A; Virtanen J; Huotilainen M; Tootell RB; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Nov; 82(5):2545-55. PubMed ID: 10561425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining fMRI with EEG and MEG in order to relate patterns of brain activity to cognition.
    Freeman WJ; Ahlfors SP; Menon V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jul; 73(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 19233235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of spatial pattern scale of brain activity on the sensitivity of DOT, fMRI, EEG and MEG.
    Perdue KL; Diamond SG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83299. PubMed ID: 24376684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MEG language lateralization in partial epilepsy using dSPM of auditory event-related fields.
    Raghavan M; Li Z; Carlson C; Anderson CT; Stout J; Sabsevitz DS; Swanson SJ; Binder JR
    Epilepsy Behav; 2017 Aug; 73():247-255. PubMed ID: 28662463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.