These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19378353)

  • 21. Analytic approaches for the evaluation of costs.
    Glick HA; Polsky D
    Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):18S-22S. PubMed ID: 10386078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effectiveness of integrated care for elderly depressed patients in the PRISM-E study.
    Wiley-Exley E; Domino ME; Maxwell J; Levkoff SE
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Dec; 12(4):205-13. PubMed ID: 20195008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Constructing second-order accurate confidence intervals for communalities in factor analysis.
    Ichikawa M; Konishi S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):361-78. PubMed ID: 17535484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.
    Jiang W; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.
    Walters SJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():26. PubMed ID: 15161494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Constructing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an evaluation of parametric and non-parametric techniques using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Briggs AH; Mooney CZ; Wonderling DE
    Stat Med; 1999 Dec; 18(23):3245-62. PubMed ID: 10602149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies.
    Briggs AH; O'Brien BJ; Blackhouse G
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2002; 23():377-401. PubMed ID: 11910068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Problematic standard errors and confidence intervals for skewness and kurtosis.
    Wright DB; Herrington JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 21298573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bootstrap-based methods for estimating standard errors in Cox's regression analyses of clustered event times.
    Xiao Y; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):915-23. PubMed ID: 20213705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation.
    Briggs AH; Wonderling DE; Mooney CZ
    Health Econ; 1997; 6(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 9285227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
    Wedenberg M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uncertainty in decision models analyzing cost-effectiveness: the joint distribution of incremental costs and effectiveness evaluated with a nonparametric bootstrap method.
    Hunink MG; Bult JR; de Vries J; Weinstein MC
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 9679999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap.
    Barber JA; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(23):3219-36. PubMed ID: 11113956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves--caveats quantified.
    Jakubczyk M; Kamiński B
    Health Econ; 2010 Aug; 19(8):955-63. PubMed ID: 19688780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating uncertainty ranges for costs by the bootstrap procedure combined with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
    Lord J; Asante MA
    Health Econ; 1999 Jun; 8(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 10398525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net-health benefit: two sides of the same coin.
    Craig BA; Black MA
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2001 Oct; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 19807506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods.
    Polsky D; Glick HA; Willke R; Schulman K
    Health Econ; 1997; 6(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 9226142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monte Carlo simulation of the cost-effectiveness of sample size maintenance programs revealed the need to consider substitution sampling.
    David MC; Bensink M; Higashi H; Donald M; Alati R; Ware RS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1200-11. PubMed ID: 23017637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.