These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19378413)

  • 1. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Oct; 25(7):951-67. PubMed ID: 18608322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
    Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The visual coding of grip aperture shows an early but not late adherence to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Mulla A; Holmes SA; Smuskowitz LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 490(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 21194553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
    Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Both vision-for-perception and vision-for-action follow Weber's law at small object sizes, but violate it at larger sizes.
    Bruno N; Uccelli S; Viviani E; de'Sperati C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():327-334. PubMed ID: 27553269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?
    Katsumata H
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 24446928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1939-47. PubMed ID: 17240408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The involvement of cognitive processing in a perceptual-motor process examined with EEG time-frequency analysis.
    Katsumata H; Suzuki K; Tanaka T; Imanaka K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):484-96. PubMed ID: 19136298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goal-directed grasping: the dimensional properties of an object influence the nature of the visual information mediating aperture shaping.
    Holmes SA; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23501700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory mechanisms in grasping.
    Hesse C; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1532-45. PubMed ID: 18775734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 23796704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory.
    Ganel T; Freud E; Meiran N
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size-weight illusion, anticipation, and adaptation of fingertip forces in patients with cerebellar degeneration.
    Rabe K; Brandauer B; Li Y; Gizewski ER; Timmann D; Hermsdörfer J
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):569-79. PubMed ID: 19036861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A hand in blindsight: hand placement near target improves size perception in the blind visual field.
    Brown LE; Kroliczak G; Demonet JF; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):786-802. PubMed ID: 18206962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.