These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19378415)

  • 1. Threat perception and targeting: the brainstem-amygdala-cortex alarm system in action?
    Csathó A; Tey F; Davis G
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):1039-64. PubMed ID: 19378415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threat perception and targeting: The brainstem-amygdala-cortex alarm system in action?
    Csatho A; Tey F; Davis G
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Oct; 25(7):1039-64. PubMed ID: 18608332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A direct brainstem-amygdala-cortical 'alarm' system for subliminal signals of fear.
    Liddell BJ; Brown KJ; Kemp AH; Barton MJ; Das P; Peduto A; Gordon E; Williams LM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):235-43. PubMed ID: 15588615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Soltani M; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain structures activated by overt and covert emotional visual stimuli.
    Sabatini E; Della Penna S; Franciotti R; Ferretti A; Zoccolotti P; Rossini PM; Romani GL; Gainotti G
    Brain Res Bull; 2009 Jun; 79(5):258-64. PubMed ID: 19480985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instructed delay discharge in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex within the context of a selective attention task.
    Meftah el-M; Bourgeon S; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2649-67. PubMed ID: 19225170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual sexual content on the event-related potential.
    van Lankveld JJ; Smulders FT
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 18541359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention.
    Vuilleumier P
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Dec; 9(12):585-94. PubMed ID: 16289871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli.
    Marzi CA; Mancini F; Metitieri T; Savazzi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1489-95. PubMed ID: 16360710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right hemisphere fails to orient to the negative valence of visually presented words.
    Thierry G; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(12):1231-4. PubMed ID: 18628671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Top-down' influences of ipsilateral or contralateral postero-temporal visual cortices on the extra-classical receptive fields of neurons in cat's striate cortex.
    Bardy C; Huang JY; Wang C; Fitzgibbon T; Dreher B
    Neuroscience; 2009 Jan; 158(2):951-68. PubMed ID: 18976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absence of S-cone input in human blindsight following hemispherectomy.
    Leh SE; Mullen KT; Ptito A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 24(10):2954-60. PubMed ID: 17156217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children.
    Flores AB; Digiacomo MR; Meneres S; Trigo E; Gómez CM
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19500893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual streams and shifting attention.
    Brown JM
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():47-63. PubMed ID: 19733749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enter feelings: somatosensory responses following early stages of visual induction of emotion.
    Rudrauf D; Lachaux JP; Damasio A; Baillet S; Hugueville L; Martinerie J; Damasio H; Renault B
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Apr; 72(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 18938199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuroanatomical correlates of visual field bias: a sensitive system for detecting potential threats?
    Preibisch C; Lanfermann H; Wallenhorst T; Walter H; Erk S
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1263():69-77. PubMed ID: 19368816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual field asymmetries in selective attention: evidence from a modified search paradigm.
    Michael GA; Ojéda N
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 16026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BIS/BAS, cortical oscillations and coherence in response to emotional cues.
    Balconi M; Brambilla E; Falbo L
    Brain Res Bull; 2009 Sep; 80(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 19591907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method.
    Li L; Yao D; Yin G
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():84-94. PubMed ID: 19501069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.