431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19379049)
1. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.
Soll JB; Larrick RP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):780-805. PubMed ID: 19379049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spurious consensus and opinion revision: why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?
Yaniv I; Choshen-Hillel S; Milyavsky M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):558-63. PubMed ID: 19271867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
Topolinski S; Strack F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.
Glöckner A; Betsch T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1055-75. PubMed ID: 18763891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning to choose: Cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making.
Mata R; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Jun; 25(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 20545415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inferences from memory: strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared.
Persson M; Rieskamp J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18986638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.
Kahneman D; Klein G
Am Psychol; 2009 Sep; 64(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 19739881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.
Juslin P; Winman A; Hansson P
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):678-703. PubMed ID: 17638502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives.
Simmons JP; Nelson LD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 16846272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Children's understanding of posterior probability.
Girotto V; Gonzalez M
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):325-44. PubMed ID: 17391661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.
Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
Inbar Y; Cone J; Gilovich T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):232-47. PubMed ID: 20658841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intuitive theories of information: beliefs about the value of redundancy.
Soll JB
Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):317-46. PubMed ID: 10090806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies.
Rieskamp J; Otto PE
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):207-36. PubMed ID: 16719651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory.
Thadeus Meeks J; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):997-1004. PubMed ID: 17052920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
Koehler DJ; James G
Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies.
Bröder A; Schiffer S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):904-18. PubMed ID: 16822156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms.
Hertwig R; Pachur T; Kurzenhäuser S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):621-42. PubMed ID: 16060769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
