These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19379052)

  • 1. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning.
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
    Finn B; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
    Scheck P; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Divided attention at encoding: effect on feeling-of-knowing.
    Sacher M; Taconnat L; Souchay C; Isingrini M
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):754-61. PubMed ID: 19423362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Process demands of rejection mechanisms of recognition memory.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD; Gama JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 18763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Episodic inhibition.
    Racsmány M; Conway MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 16478339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Jakab E; Raaijmakers JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):607-17. PubMed ID: 19379039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition and frequency judgments in young and elderly adults.
    Freund JS; Witte KL
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 3717457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remembering can cause inhibition: retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process.
    Veling H; van Knippenberg A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 14979806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.