566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19380405)
1. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.
Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2009 May; 50 Suppl 1():11S-20S. PubMed ID: 19380405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values.
Jaskowiak CJ; Bianco JA; Perlman SB; Fine JP
J Nucl Med; 2005 Mar; 46(3):424-8. PubMed ID: 15750154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: a clinical perspective.
Lucignani G; Paganelli G; Bombardieri E
Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jul; 25(7):651-6. PubMed ID: 15208491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 18F-FDG PET as a candidate for "qualified biomarker": functional assessment of treatment response in oncology.
Larson SM; Schwartz LH
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jun; 47(6):901-3. PubMed ID: 16741296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Understanding positon emission tomography (PET) with [18F]-FDG in clinical oncology. Informations dedicated to patients and relatives].
Bourguet P; Brusco S; Corone C; Devillers A; Foehrenbach H; Lumbroso JD; Maszelin P; Montravers F; Moretti JL; Rain JD; Talbot JN; Carretier J; Leichtnam-Dugarin L; Delavigne V; Philip T; Fervers B; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Bull Cancer; 2005 Jul; 92(7):723-32. PubMed ID: 16123010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.
Westerterp M; Pruim J; Oyen W; Hoekstra O; Paans A; Visser E; van Lanschot J; Sloof G; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 17033848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Technical Approaches for Quantitative Treatment Responses Using 18F-FDG PET].
Miwa K; Miyaji N; Umeda T; Murata T; Wagatsuma K; Sasaki M
Igaku Butsuri; 2015; 35(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 26753394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Lasnon C; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 27283930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5.
Hashimoto Y; Tsujikawa T; Kondo C; Maki M; Momose M; Nagai A; Ohnuki T; Nishikawa T; Kusakabe K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 16513611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Klatskin's tumor in extrahepatic bile duct strictures using delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT: preliminary results for 22 patient studies.
Reinhardt MJ; Strunk H; Gerhardt T; Roedel R; Jaeger U; Bucerius J; Sauerbruch T; Biersack HJ; Dumoulin FL
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1158-63. PubMed ID: 16000285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology.
Fletcher JW; Djulbegovic B; Soares HP; Siegel BA; Lowe VJ; Lyman GH; Coleman RE; Wahl R; Paschold JC; Avril N; Einhorn LH; Suh WW; Samson D; Delbeke D; Gorman M; Shields AF
J Nucl Med; 2008 Mar; 49(3):480-508. PubMed ID: 18287273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy.
Kinahan PE; Fletcher JW
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Dec; 31(6):496-505. PubMed ID: 21147377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
Tylski P; Stute S; Grotus N; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Vanderlinden B; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20080896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological aspects of multicenter studies with quantitative PET.
Boellaard R
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 727():335-49. PubMed ID: 21331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of the normal adrenal gland with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Bagheri B; Maurer AH; Cone L; Doss M; Adler L
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1340-3. PubMed ID: 15299059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Need for standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments.
Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2011 Dec; 52 Suppl 2():93S-100S. PubMed ID: 22144561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0.
Boellaard R; O'Doherty MJ; Weber WA; Mottaghy FM; Lonsdale MN; Stroobants SG; Oyen WJ; Kotzerke J; Hoekstra OS; Pruim J; Marsden PK; Tatsch K; Hoekstra CJ; Visser EP; Arends B; Verzijlbergen FJ; Zijlstra JM; Comans EF; Lammertsma AA; Paans AM; Willemsen AT; Beyer T; Bockisch A; Schaefer-Prokop C; Delbeke D; Baum RP; Chiti A; Krause BJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Jan; 37(1):181-200. PubMed ID: 19915839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of dual time point (18)F-FDG PET imaging for the differentiation between malignant and benign lesions.
Lan XL; Zhang YX; Wu ZJ; Jia Q; Wei H; Gao ZR
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):756-64. PubMed ID: 18555033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
