353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19380558)
1. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extracolonic findings from CTC: balancing risks and benefits.
Rutter CM; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):W470; author reply 471. PubMed ID: 19843731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.
Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Hess-Migliorretti A; Riou F; Grolier J; Josselin JM
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jun; 22(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19574924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.
Zafar HM; Yang J; Armstrong K; Groeneveld P
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 25890873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3-D computerized tomography colonography versus optical colonoscopy for imaging symptomatic gastroenterology patients.
Gomes M; Aldridge RW; Wylie P; Bell J; Epstein O
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 23512599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.
Kuntz KM; Popp J; Beck JR; Zauber AG; Weinberg DS
BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32933928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Greuter MJ; Berkhof J; Fijneman RJ; Demirel E; Lew JB; Meijer GA; Stoker J; Coupé VM
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150910. PubMed ID: 27194458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.
Sweet A; Lee D; Gairy K; Phiri D; Reason T; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 21174482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Boer R; Wilschut J; Habbema JD
Int J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 124(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 19048626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
