These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1938072)
1. Skin irritation. In vitro assays. Bason MM; Gordon V; Maibach HI Int J Dermatol; 1991 Sep; 30(9):623-6. PubMed ID: 1938072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Establishment and evaluation of immortalized human epidermal keratinocytes for an alternative skin irritation test. Kim CW; Kim CD; Choi KC J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017; 88(Pt 2):130-139. PubMed ID: 28827132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro skin irritation assays: relevance to human skin. Harvell J; Bason MM; Maibach HI J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 1992; 30(3):359-69. PubMed ID: 1512809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals. Eskes C; Cole T; Hoffmann S; Worth A; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):603-19. PubMed ID: 18186668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro skin irritancy: application of keratinocytes cell culture and its correlation with human patch test responses. Eun HC Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 22():231-6. PubMed ID: 7587328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HSP27 as a biomarker for predicting skin irritation in human skin and reconstructed organotypic skin model. Chen H; Li S; Meng T; Zhang L; Dai T; Xiang Q; Su Z; Zhang Q; Huang Y Toxicol Lett; 2014 Apr; 226(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 24503015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of concentration, exposure duration, and patch occlusivity upon rabbit primary dermal irritation indices. Gilman MR; Evans RA; De Salva SJ Drug Chem Toxicol; 1978; 1(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 755678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human skin in organ culture and human skin cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts) in monolayer culture for assessment of chemically induced skin damage. Varani J; Perone P; Spahlinger DM; Singer LM; Diegel KL; Bobrowski WF; Dunstan R Toxicol Pathol; 2007 Aug; 35(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 17763283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of three-dimensional in vitro human tissue models. Whalen E; Donnelly TA; Naughton G; Rheins LA Hum Exp Toxicol; 1994 Dec; 13(12):853-9. PubMed ID: 7718305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Property characterization of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents, and performance as a skin irritation model. Capallere C; Plaza C; Meyrignac C; Arcioni M; Brulas M; Busuttil V; Garcia I; Bauza É; Botto JM Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Dec; 53():45-56. PubMed ID: 30053440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests. Wilhelm KP; Böttjer B; Siegers CP Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11736893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays. Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irritating effects of sodium lauryl sulfate on human primary keratinocytes at subtoxic levels of exposure. Choi H; Shin MK; Ahn HJ; Lee TR; Son Y; Kim KS Microsc Res Tech; 2018 Nov; 81(11):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 30295372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of irritant potential of shampoos using cultured human epidermal keratinocytes model and patch test reaction measured by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eun HC; Jung SY Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Mar; 30(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 8187517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strategies for the assessment of acute skin irritation potential. Robinson MK; Osborne R; Perkins MA J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 1999 Sep; 42(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10715598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. Welss T; Basketter DA; Schröder KR Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Jun; 18(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 15046769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential. Perkins MA; Osborne R; Rana FR; Ghassemi A; Robinson MK Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 10353313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of skin sensitizers from irritant chemicals by interleukin-1α and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 in murine keratinocytes. Son D; Na Y; Cho WS; Lee BH; Heo Y; Park JH; Seok SH Toxicol Lett; 2013 Jan; 216(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 23178550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of potential biomarkers for predicting acute dermal irritation by proteomic analysis. Zhang Q; Dai T; Zhang L; Zhang M; Xiao X; Hu H; Zou P; Liu X; Xiang Q; Su Z; Huang Y; He QY J Appl Toxicol; 2011 Nov; 31(8):762-72. PubMed ID: 21469165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]