BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19380971)

  • 21. Assessing the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research.
    Friedman DJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2006 Jan; (143):1-83. PubMed ID: 17552126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using a phased-in incremental approach to EMR implementation.
    McGrath D
    J Med Pract Manage; 2009; 24(6):355-7. PubMed ID: 19663360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dam it! How to harness EMR (electronic medical record) power.
    Reed T
    Healthc Inform; 1997 Apr; 14(4):51-2, 54, 56-60. PubMed ID: 10166768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electronic medical records: a 'workflow' in progress.
    Briggs B
    Health Data Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(6):64-9. PubMed ID: 12078398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of nurse attitudes before implementation and 6 and 18 months after implementation of an electronic health record.
    Laramee AS; Bosek M; Shaner-McRae H; Powers-Phaneuf T
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Oct; 30(10):521-30. PubMed ID: 22584880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The value of vendor-reported ambulatory EHR benefits data.
    Thompson D; Classen D; Garrido T; Bisordi J; Novogoratz S; Zywiak W
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 Apr; 61(4):82-6. PubMed ID: 17427467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid implementation of an electronic health record in an academic setting.
    Badger SL; Bosch RG; Toteja P
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2005; 19(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 15869211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.
    Tjora AH; Scambler G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 19054601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective.
    Terry AL; Giles G; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2009; 41(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 19582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. "Physicians' Adoption Score" - physicians are not a homogenous group.
    Sajedi M; Kushniruk AW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 143():395-9. PubMed ID: 19380967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Will paper ever go away? Document imagers bet it won't.
    Siwicki B
    Health Data Manag; 1995 Sep; 3(8):49-50, 52, 54-5. PubMed ID: 10151202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementation of an electronic documentation system using microsystem and quality improvement concepts.
    Rikli J; Huizinga B; Schafer D; Atwater A; Coker K; Sikora C
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 19363324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The gap between actual and mandated use of an electronic medication record three years after deployment.
    Granlien MF; Hertzum M; Gudmundsen J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():419-24. PubMed ID: 18487767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Five steps to electronic health record success.
    Wood JT; Aceves R
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 Jan; 59(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 15689012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Economic externalities of health information technology. A game theoretic model for electronic health record adoption.
    Woodside JM
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(4):25-31. PubMed ID: 19195278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Education and training in health telematics: the critical factor of user acceptance.
    Iakovidis I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 72():3-4. PubMed ID: 11010331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The sociology of change.
    McGrath D
    J Med Pract Manage; 2009; 25(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 19911546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electronic medical records: if not now, when?
    Carroll J
    Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 9(7):24-5, 29-30, 33-4. PubMed ID: 18540339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Constructing technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway.
    Boulus N; Bjorn P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 130():143-55. PubMed ID: 17917189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fitness for purpose when there are many different purposes: who are electronic patient records for?
    Eason K; Waterson P
    Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 24282190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.