These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19380999)

  • 1. Difference in the odor concentrations measured by the triangle odor bag method and dynamic olfactometry.
    Ueno H; Amano S; Merecka B; Kośmider J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1339-42. PubMed ID: 19380999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odor concentration decay and stability in gas sampling bags.
    van Harreveld AP
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jan; 53(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 12568253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus.
    Stöckel S; Cordes J; Stoffels B; Wildanger D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):24787-24797. PubMed ID: 29926329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambient odour testing of concentrated animal feeding operations using field and laboratory olfactometers.
    Newby BD; McGinley MA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):109-14. PubMed ID: 15484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of odor intensity measurement using dynamic olfactometry.
    Jiang J; Coffey P; Toohey B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 May; 56(5):675-83. PubMed ID: 16739805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proficiency testing as the key element in implementing EN13275 olfactometry.
    Van Harreveld AP; Mannebeck D; Maxeiner B
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1649-55. PubMed ID: 19403979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the odor impact of some environmental gaseous pollutants: calibration of the methodology and preliminary results.
    Coccia V; Manni M; Petrozzi A; Nicolini A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(29):29295-29303. PubMed ID: 30121760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relevance of n-butanol as a reference gas for odorants and complex odors.
    Feilberg A; Hansen MJ; Pontoppidan O; Oxbøl A; Jonassen K
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 77(5-6):1751-1756. PubMed ID: 29595178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability of odorants from pig production in sampling bags for olfactometry.
    Hansen MJ; Adamsen AP; Feilberg A; Jonassen KE
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1096-102. PubMed ID: 21712578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interlaboratory comparison of olfactometry in Japan.
    Higuchi T; Masuda J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 15484755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odor measurements for manure spreading using a subsurface deposition applicator.
    Lau A; Bittman S; Lemus G
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2003 Mar; 38(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 12617560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Odor and irritation thresholds for ammonia: a comparison between static and dynamic olfactometry.
    Smeets MA; Bulsing PJ; van Rooden S; Steinmann R; de Ru JA; Ogink NW; van Thriel C; Dalton PH
    Chem Senses; 2007 Jan; 32(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17003100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias of Tedlar bags in the measurement of agricultural odorants.
    Trabue SL; Anhalt JC; Zahn JA
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(5):1668-77. PubMed ID: 16899738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a method for odor sampling on solid area sources.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Barczak R; Il Grande M; Del Rosso R
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(8):1607-13. PubMed ID: 22907441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated Collection of Real-Time Alerts of Citizens as a Useful Tool to Continuously Monitor Malodorous Emissions.
    Brattoli M; Mazzone A; Giua R; Assennato G; de Gennaro G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 26927148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using olfactometry to measure intensity and threshold dilution ratio for evaluating swine odor.
    Chen Y; Bundy DS; Hoff SJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1999 Jul; 49(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 10436766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of uncertainty in olfactometry.
    Higuchi T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1409-13. PubMed ID: 19381007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assured measurements of animal building emissions: odor concentrations.
    Jacobson LD; Hetchler BP; Schmidt DR; Nicolai RE; Heber AJ; Ni JQ; Hoff SJ; Koziel JA; Zhang Y; Beasley DB; Parker DB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Jun; 58(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18581810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-carcinogenic occupational exposure risk related to foundry emissions: focus on the workers involved in olfactometric assessments.
    Polvara E; Capelli LMT; Sironi S
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2021; 56(6):646-659. PubMed ID: 33952112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovery of agricultural odors and odorous compounds from polyvinyl fluoride film bags.
    Parker DB; Perschbacher-Buser ZL; Cole NA; Koziel JA
    Sensors (Basel); 2010; 10(9):8536-52. PubMed ID: 22163671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.