These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19381007)

  • 1. Estimation of uncertainty in olfactometry.
    Higuchi T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1409-13. PubMed ID: 19381007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interlaboratory comparison of olfactometry in Japan.
    Higuchi T; Masuda J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 15484755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difference in the odor concentrations measured by the triangle odor bag method and dynamic olfactometry.
    Ueno H; Amano S; Merecka B; Kośmider J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1339-42. PubMed ID: 19380999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proficiency testing as the key element in implementing EN13275 olfactometry.
    Van Harreveld AP; Mannebeck D; Maxeiner B
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1649-55. PubMed ID: 19403979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems.
    Franke W; Frechen FB; Giebel S
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1721-6. PubMed ID: 19448306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interlaboratory comparison of dynamic olfactometry in Central Europe 2000.
    Mannebeck D; Mannebeck H
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):27-32. PubMed ID: 11762473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus.
    Stöckel S; Cordes J; Stoffels B; Wildanger D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):24787-24797. PubMed ID: 29926329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directive on odour in ambient air: an established system of odour measurement and odour regulation in Germany.
    Both R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):119-26. PubMed ID: 11762451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of field olfactometers in a controlled chamber using hydrogen sulfide as the test odorant.
    McGinley MA; McGinley CM
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):75-82. PubMed ID: 15484745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring of biological odour filtration in closed environments with olfactometry and an electronic nose.
    Willers H; de Gijsel P; Ogink N; D'Amico A; Martinelli E; Di Natale C; van Ras N; van der Waarde J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):93-100. PubMed ID: 15484747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of odour with focus on sampling techniques.
    Bockreis A; Steinberg I
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(9):859-63. PubMed ID: 16140516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applicability of sniffing team observations: experience of field measurements.
    Van Langenhove H; Van Broeck G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):65-70. PubMed ID: 11762485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas.
    Kulig A; Szyłak-Szydłowski M; Wiśniewska M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardisation of a European measurement method for the determination of total gaseous mercury: results of the field trial campaign and determination of a measurement uncertainty and working range.
    Brown RJ; Pirrone N; van Hoek C; Sprovieri F; Fernandez R; Toté K
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Mar; 12(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20445858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of methods for the estimation of measurement uncertainty for an analytical method for sulphonamides.
    Dabalus Islam M; Schweikert Turcu M; Cannavan A
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2008 Dec; 25(12):1439-50. PubMed ID: 19680854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA; Dunlop M; Duperouzel D; Burrell D; Bell K; Gallagher E; Nicholas P; Heinrich N
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18625551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of odour assessment criteria in New South Wales and application of the criteria for the assessment of a major public works project.
    Kaye R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):111-8. PubMed ID: 11762450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of odour emissions in a wastewater treatment plant using a drone-based chemical sensor system.
    Burgués J; Doñate S; Esclapez MD; Saúco L; Marco S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 846():157290. PubMed ID: 35839880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of measurement uncertainty for quantitative methods of analysis: comparative assessment of the precision (uncertainty) of bacterial colony counts.
    Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17316860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.