127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19381103)
1. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis.
Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Garcia Júnior IR; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):757-61. PubMed ID: 19381103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; Alves-Rezende MC; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Santiago JF; de Moraes SL; de Carvalho BM
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 20545530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution on short implants with different designs: a photoelastic analysis.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; Sônego MV; de Lima TM; Pesqueira AA; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27696920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant-retained silicone oculo-palpebral prosthesis on stress distribution: a pilot study using a photoelastic model.
Cortizo DL; Kodama RM; Oliveira JA; Mesquita AM; Laganá DC; Dib LL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1303-9. PubMed ID: 26574856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical and prosthetic considerations to rehabilitate an ocular defect using extraoral implants: a clinical report.
de Negreiros WA; Verde MA; da Silva AM; Pinto LP
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 22339798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Nobrega AS; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Oct; 18(10):106009. PubMed ID: 24129983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vacuum form sheet as a guide for fabrication of orbital prosthesis.
Dugad JA; Dholam KP; Chougule AT
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):390-2. PubMed ID: 24445029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone-anchored auricular facial prostheses.
Voigt A; Christ S; Klein M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):664-8. PubMed ID: 18440779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
