127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19381103)
21. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jun; 18(6):061203. PubMed ID: 23143194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses, part II: photoelastic imaging.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; da Silva EV; Haddad MF; Moreno A; Zahoui A; dos Santos DM
J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jun; 19(6):066012. PubMed ID: 24972360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Photoelastic analysis to compare implant-retained and conventional obturator dentures.
Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jun; 17(6):061203. PubMed ID: 22734733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Photoelastic Stress Distribution Produced by Different Retention Systems for a Single-Implant Mandibular Overdenture.
Nascimento JFM; Aguiar-Júnior FA; Nogueira TE; Rodrigues RCS; Leles CR
J Prosthodont; 2015 Oct; 24(7):538-542. PubMed ID: 25659847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stress pattern generated by different post and core material combinations: a photoelastic study.
Afroz S; Tripathi A; Chand P; Shanker R
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 23852240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stress distribution in Co-Cr implant frameworks after laser or TIG welding.
de Castro GC; de Araújo CA; Mesquita MF; Consani RL; Nóbilo MA
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 23780359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical evaluation of spring system for implant-supported prosthesis: analysis by photoelasticity and extensometry.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; da Silva EV; Sônego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 May; 41(4):309-313. PubMed ID: 28351185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis.
de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 18548962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
