These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19381103)

  • 61. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. An impression technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Korkmaz T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 18589075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Evaluation of different retention systems on a distal extension removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Goiato MC; Gennari Filho H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 20485037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution.
    Abreu RT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 20546493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
    Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Narrow-diameter implants as terminal support for occlusal three-unit FPDs: a biomechanical analysis.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 15626314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
    Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Retention and Mechanical Behavior of Attachment Systems for Implant-Retained Auricular Prostheses.
    Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Goulart DR; Santos ZT; Alvarez-Pinzon N; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):134-138. PubMed ID: 27922962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
    Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Macro design effects on stress distribution around implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Ozkir SE; Terzioglu H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 23422604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Finite element analysis of a condylar support prosthesis to replace the temporomandibular joint.
    Abel EW; Hilgers A; McLoughlin PM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 25703687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Force generation by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Bonds PW; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):191-4; discussion 195-6. PubMed ID: 1416238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Single-stage osseointegrated implants for nasal prosthodontic rehabilitation: A clinical report.
    de Carvalho BM; Freitas-Pontes KM; de Negreiros WA; Verde MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):293-6. PubMed ID: 25976710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.