191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19382019)
61. Effects of the alpha-particle emitter At-211 and low-dose-rate gamma-radiation on the human cell line Colo-205 as studied with a growth assay.
Palm S; Bäck T; Claesson I; Delle U; Hultborn R; Jacobsson L; Köpf I; Lindegren S
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(3A):1671-6. PubMed ID: 9673388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Effect of americium-241 alpha-particles on the dose-response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Barquinero JF; Stephan G; Schmid E
Int J Radiat Biol; 2004 Feb; 80(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15164797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. High and low fluences of alpha-particles induce a G1 checkpoint in human diploid fibroblasts.
Azzam EI; de Toledo SM; Waker AJ; Little JB
Cancer Res; 2000 May; 60(10):2623-31. PubMed ID: 10825133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The sensitivity of the alkaline comet assay in detecting DNA lesions induced by X rays, gamma rays and alpha particles.
Rössler U; Hornhardt S; Seidl C; Müller-Laue E; Walsh L; Panzer W; Schmid E; Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R; Gomolka M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):154-9. PubMed ID: 17182604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Effect of 0.1 Gy X-ray irradiation on gene expression profiles in normal human lymphoblastoid cells].
Li JQ; Hou DJ; Ma Y; Feng L; Li WG; Liu W; Qiao JW; Jia XM; Li K
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 31(10):749-52. PubMed ID: 24148952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Radiopharmaceutical chemistry of targeted radiotherapeutics, Part 3: alpha-particle-induced radiolytic effects on the chemical behavior of (211)At.
Pozzi OR; Zalutsky MR
J Nucl Med; 2007 Jul; 48(7):1190-6. PubMed ID: 17574991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Alterations in the progression of cells through the cell cycle after exposure to alpha particles or gamma rays.
Gadbois DM; Crissman HA; Nastasi A; Habbersett R; Wang SK; Chen D; Lehnert BE
Radiat Res; 1996 Oct; 146(4):414-24. PubMed ID: 8927713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Dose response of micronuclei induced by combination radiation of α-particles and γ-rays in human lymphoblast cells.
Ren R; He M; Dong C; Xie Y; Ye S; Yuan D; Shao C
Mutat Res; 2013; 741-742():51-6. PubMed ID: 23313503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Transcriptional response of lymphoblastoid cells to ionizing radiation.
Jen KY; Cheung VG
Genome Res; 2003 Sep; 13(9):2092-100. PubMed ID: 12915489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Biological effects of passive versus active scanning proton beams on human lung epithelial cells.
Gridley DS; Pecaut MJ; Mao XW; Wroe AJ; Luo-Owen X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 14(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 24325134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Gene expression in low- and high-dose-irradiated human peripheral blood lymphocytes: possible applications for biodosimetry.
Knops K; Boldt S; Wolkenhauer O; Kriehuber R
Radiat Res; 2012 Oct; 178(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 22954392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Exposure of patients to low doses of X-radiation during neuro-interventional imaging and procedures: Dose estimation and analysis of γ-H2AX foci and gene expression in blood lymphocytes.
Visweswaran S; Joseph S; Dhanasekaran J; Paneerselvam S; Annalakshmi O; Jose MT; Perumal V
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 856-857():503237. PubMed ID: 32928370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Identification and Validation of Candidate Radiation-responsive Genes for Human Biodosimetr.
Li S; Lu X; Feng JB; Tian M; Liu QJ
Biomed Environ Sci; 2017 Nov; 30(11):834-840. PubMed ID: 29216961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Proto-oncogene expression: a predictive assay for radiation biodosimetry applications.
Miller AC; Luo L; Chin WK; Director-Myska AE; Prasanna PG; Blakely WF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):295-302. PubMed ID: 12194311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Hypothermia modulates the DNA damage response to ionizing radiation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
Lisowska H; Cheng L; Sollazzo A; Lundholm L; Wegierek-Ciuk A; Sommer S; Lankoff A; Wojcik A
Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Jun; 94(6):551-557. PubMed ID: 29668347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Role of blood derived cell fractions, temperature and sample transport on gene expression-based biological dosimetry.
Nasser F; Cruz-Garcia L; O'Brien G; Badie C
Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(5):675-686. PubMed ID: 33826469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Impact of GADD45A on Radiation Biodosimetry Using Mouse Peripheral Blood.
Broustas CG; Mukherjee S; Shuryak I; Taraboletti A; Angdisen J; Ake P; Fornace AJ; Amundson SA
Radiat Res; 2023 Sep; 200(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 37421415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Development of gene expression signatures for practical radiation biodosimetry.
Paul S; Amundson SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1236-1244. PubMed ID: 18572087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Measurement of γ-H2AX foci, miRNA-101, and gene expression as a means to quantify radiation-absorbed dose in cancer patients who had undergone radiotherapy.
Raavi V; Surendran J; Karthik K; Paul SFD; Thayalan K; Arunakaran J; Venkatachalam P
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2019 Mar; 58(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 30467642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
