504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19382140)
1. Discrimination of extant Pan species and subspecies using the enamel-dentine junction morphology of lower molars.
Skinner MM; Gunz P; Wood BA; Boesch C; Hublin JJ
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19382140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How many landmarks? Assessing the classification accuracy of Pan lower molars using a geometric morphometric analysis of the occlusal basin as seen at the enamel-dentine junction.
Skinner MM; Gunz P; Wood BA; Hublin JJ
Front Oral Biol; 2009; 13():23-29. PubMed ID: 19828964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) morphology distinguishes the lower molars of Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus.
Skinner MM; Gunz P; Wood BA; Hublin JJ
J Hum Evol; 2008 Dec; 55(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 18824253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental trait expression at the enamel-dentine junction of lower molars in extant and fossil hominoids.
Skinner MM; Wood BA; Boesch C; Olejniczak AJ; Rosas A; Smith TM; Hublin JJ
J Hum Evol; 2008 Feb; 54(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 18048081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel-dentine junction shape.
Smith TM; Olejniczak AJ; Reid DJ; Ferrell RJ; Hublin JJ
Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(11):974-95. PubMed ID: 16814245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphology of the enamel-dentine junction in sections of anthropoid primate maxillary molars.
Olejniczak AJ; Gilbert CC; Martin LB; Smith TM; Ulhaas L; Grine FE
J Hum Evol; 2007 Sep; 53(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 17582465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protostylid expression at the enamel-dentine junction and enamel surface of mandibular molars of Paranthropus robustus and Australopithecus africanus.
Skinner MM; Wood BA; Hublin JJ
J Hum Evol; 2009 Jan; 56(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18986683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brief communication: Contributions of enamel-dentine junction shape and enamel deposition to primate molar crown complexity.
Skinner MM; Evans A; Smith T; Jernvall J; Tafforeau P; Kupczik K; Olejniczak AJ; Rosas A; Radovcić J; Thackeray JF; Toussaint M; Hublin JJ
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 May; 142(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 20091839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allometric and metameric shape variation in Pan mandibular molars: a digital morphometric analysis.
Singleton M; Rosenberger AL; Robinson C; O'neill R
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Feb; 294(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 21235007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos.
Lieberman DE; Carlo J; Ponce de León M; Zollikofer CP
J Hum Evol; 2007 Jun; 52(6):647-62. PubMed ID: 17298840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carabelli's trait revisited: an examination of mesiolingual features at the enamel-dentine junction and enamel surface of Pan and Homo sapiens upper molars.
Ortiz A; Skinner MM; Bailey SE; Hublin JJ
J Hum Evol; 2012 Oct; 63(4):586-96. PubMed ID: 22889682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population systematics of chimpanzees using molar morphometrics.
Pilbrow V
J Hum Evol; 2006 Dec; 51(6):646-62. PubMed ID: 16965803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of dentine shape in anthropoid primates.
Olejniczak AJ; Martin LB; Ulhaas L
Ann Anat; 2004 Dec; 186(5-6):479-85. PubMed ID: 15646281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular shape diversity in Pan.
Robinson C
J Hum Evol; 2012 Jul; 63(1):191-204. PubMed ID: 22682959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does space in the jaw influence the timing of molar crown initiation? A model using baboons (Papio anubis) and great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus).
Boughner JC; Dean MC
J Hum Evol; 2004 Mar; 46(3):255-77. PubMed ID: 14984783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Taxonomic and functional aspects of the patterning of enamel thickness distribution in extant large-bodied hominoids.
Schwartz GT
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Feb; 111(2):221-44. PubMed ID: 10640949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-individual metameric variation expressed at the enamel-dentine junction of lower post-canine dentition of South African fossil hominins and modern humans.
Pan L; Thackeray JF; Dumoncel J; Zanolli C; Oettlé A; de Beer F; Hoffman J; Duployer B; Tenailleau C; Braga J
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Aug; 163(4):806-815. PubMed ID: 28573649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of cross striation spacings in cuspal enamel and of four methods of estimating the time taken to grow molar cuspal enamel in Pan, Pongo and Homo.
Dean MC
J Hum Evol; 1998; 35(4-5):449-62. PubMed ID: 9774505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The morphology of the enamel-dentine junction in Neanderthal molars: Gross morphology, non-metric traits, and temporal trends.
Martin RMG; Hublin JJ; Gunz P; Skinner MM
J Hum Evol; 2017 Feb; 103():20-44. PubMed ID: 28166906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The enamel-dentine junction in the postcanine dentition of Australopithecus africanus: intra-individual metameric and antimeric variation.
Braga J; Thackeray JF; Subsol G; Kahn JL; Maret D; Treil J; Beck A
J Anat; 2010 Jan; 216(1):62-79. PubMed ID: 19900182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
