These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1938244)

  • 1. Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking grading systems.
    Cintra ML; Billis A
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1991; 23(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 1938244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
    Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
    Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of WHO and Gleason histologic grading systems in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
    Ozdamar SO; Sarikaya S; Yildiz L; Atilla MK; Kandemir B; Yildiz S
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 8738623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostatic adenocarcinoma: reproducibility and correlation with clinical stages of four grading systems.
    de las Morenas A; Siroky MB; Merriam J; Stilmant MM
    Hum Pathol; 1988 May; 19(5):595-7. PubMed ID: 3371983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histological grading of prostatic carcinoma in prostatectomy specimens. Comparison of prognostic accuracy of five grading systems.
    Gallee MP; Ten Kate FJ; Mulder PG; Blom JH; van der Heul RO
    Br J Urol; 1990 Apr; 65(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2340371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostatic carcinoma reproducibility of histologic grading.
    Svanholm H; Mygind H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A; 1985 Mar; 93(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 3984736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparisons of histological grading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma].
    Fujinami K; Satomi Y; Sugawara T; Ikeda I; Ohgo Y; Harada M
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 86(9):1460-5. PubMed ID: 7474635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
    Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytological grading of prostatic aspiration biopsy: a comparison with the Gleason grading system.
    Layfield LJ; Mukamel E; Hilborne LH; Hannah JB; Glasgow BJ; Ljung BM; deKernion JB
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):798-800. PubMed ID: 3656536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimens.
    Babaian RJ; Grunow WA
    Urology; 1985 Jun; 25(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 4012946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer?
    Carter HB; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Trock BJ; Veltri RW; Nelson WG; Coffey DS; Singer EA; Epstein JI
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(35):4294-6. PubMed ID: 23032616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Gleason system use on different types of prostatic tissue samples.
    Pleşea IE; Zaharia B; Enache SD; Mitroi G; Tomescu P; Pop OT; Badea P; Kozokić A
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 1999-2004; 45():25-34. PubMed ID: 15847376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics].
    Helpap B; Egevad L
    Urologe A; 2007 Jan; 46(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17111167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update on the Gleason grading system.
    Epstein JI
    Ann Pathol; 2011 Nov; 31(5 Suppl):S20-6. PubMed ID: 22054451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Will the modification of the Gleason grading system affect the urology practice?
    Ozok HU; Sagnak L; Tuygun C; Oktay M; Karakoyunlu N; Ersoy H; Alper M
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2010 Aug; 18(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 19793829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
    Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumour variant unrecognized on T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
    Schieda N; Coffey N; Gulavita P; Al-Dandan O; Shabana W; Flood TA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1349-56. PubMed ID: 24687527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma in needle biopsies vs. radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Mazzucchelli R; Barbisan F; Tarquini LM; Filosa A; Campanini N; Galosi AB
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2005 Jun; 27(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 16121633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer and Gleason grading system.
    Fukagai T; Namiki T; Carlile RG; Sugawara S; Morita M; Shimada M; Yoshida H; Namiki H
    Int J Urol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):539-45; discussion 546-8. PubMed ID: 11737480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
    Böcking A; Kiehn J; Heinzel-Wach M
    Cancer; 1982 Jul; 50(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 7083133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.