These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19382611)

  • 1. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of frequency-related parameters of the electrohysterogram for predicting preterm delivery: a review of the literature.
    Vinken MP; Rabotti C; Mischi M; Oei SG
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2009 Aug; 64(8):529-41. PubMed ID: 19624864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram signals based on the zero-crossing rate.
    Song X; Qiao X; Hao D; Yang L; Zhou X; Xu Y; Zheng D
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1956. PubMed ID: 33479344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multichannel time-frequency and multi-wavelet toolbox for uterine electromyography processing and visualisation.
    Batista AG; Najdi S; Godinho DM; Martins C; Serrano FC; Ortigueira MD; Rato RT
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():178-91. PubMed ID: 27474810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
    de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity.
    Marque CK; Terrien J; Rihana S; Germain G
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jun; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17570165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization and automatic classification of preterm and term uterine records.
    Jager F; Libenšek S; Geršak K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202125. PubMed ID: 30153264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of Electrohysterogram Recording System for Monitoring Uterine Contraction.
    Hao D; An Y; Qiao X; Qiu Q; Zhou X; Peng J
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():4230157. PubMed ID: 31354930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated detection of premature delivery using empirical mode and wavelet packet decomposition techniques with uterine electromyogram signals.
    Acharya UR; Sudarshan VK; Rong SQ; Tan Z; Lim CM; Koh JE; Nayak S; Bhandary SV
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jun; 85():33-42. PubMed ID: 28433870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.