216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19382625)
1. [Some hints about the reviewers' ethical dilemmas].
Rumboldt Z
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Dec; 62(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 19382625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.
Merkel-Sobotta E
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2003; 9(4):390; author reply 390-1. PubMed ID: 14664494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Editors and conflict of interest.
Baggs JG; Schmitt MH
Res Nurs Health; 2003 Apr; 26(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 12652605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. To publish or not to publish?
Schechter AN; Miller FG
J Lab Clin Med; 2005 Jan; 145(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 15668655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: an international survey.
Broome M; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG
Nurs Ethics; 2010 Nov; 17(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 21097972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
Snell L; Spencer J
Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Problems and conflicts in peer review.
Kohn A; Putterman C
Int J Impot Res; 1993 Sep; 5(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 8124431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The appalling Poling saga.
Brumback RA
J Child Neurol; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1090-1; author reply 1089-90. PubMed ID: 18827280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflicts of interest in medical ethics.
Diamond EF
Ethics Med; 2004; 20(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15675074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing.
Lipworth WL; Kerridge IH; Carter SM; Little M
Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(7):1056-63. PubMed ID: 21388730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues related to publishing and reviewing.
Morgan GA; Harmon RJ; Gliner JA
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2001 Dec; 40(12):1476-8. PubMed ID: 11765295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.
Kotchoubey B; Bütof S; Sitaram R
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):829-35. PubMed ID: 25156788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A statement on ethics from the HEART Group.
HEART Group
J Interv Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 21(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 18489441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conflicts of interest and scientific integrity.
Friedman L; Richter ED
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2005; 11(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 15875898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An author's guide to publication ethics: a review of emerging standards in biomedical journals.
Roberts J
Headache; 2009 Apr; 49(4):578-89. PubMed ID: 19338617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A statement on ethics from the HEART Group.
HEART Group
Am J Cardiol; 2008 May; 101(9):1345-6. PubMed ID: 18435969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
Dahlqvist R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers.
Jurkat-Rott K; Lehmann-Horn F
Eur J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 83(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 15202567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
