These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1938283)

  • 1. Variability of high-pass resolution perimetry in normals and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Wall M; Lefante J; Conway M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Nov; 32(12):3091-5. PubMed ID: 1938283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of spatial resolution and Humphrey automated perimetry in pseudotumor cerebri patients and normal subjects.
    Wall M; Conway MD; House PH; Allely R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Dec; 32(13):3306-12. PubMed ID: 1748561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
    Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetric papilledema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prospective interocular comparison of sensory visual function.
    Wall M; White WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 39(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 9430554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast for following visual fields in prepubertal idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Stiebel-Kalish H; Lusky M; Yassur Y; Kalish Y; Shuper A; Erlich R; Lubman S; Snir M
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1673-5. PubMed ID: 15350321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional visual loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Ney JJ; Volpe NJ; Liu GT; Balcer LJ; Moster ML; Galetta SL
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1808-1813.e1. PubMed ID: 19643491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Variability of sensitivity thresholds in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the central vision field].
    Polo Llorens V; Larrosa Poves JM; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez L; Rojo Aragües A; Cuevas Andrés R; Ruiz Moreno O; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11151125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A prospective study of 50 patients.
    Wall M; George D
    Brain; 1991 Feb; 114 ( Pt 1A)():155-80. PubMed ID: 1998880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry.
    Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(11):1732-45. PubMed ID: 16412491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A study of high-pass resolution perimetry in the early diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
    Yu M; Zhou W; Ye T
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jul; 32(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 9590842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
    Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
    Yoshiyama KK; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Oct; 38(11):2270-7. PubMed ID: 9344350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
    Miranda MA; Henson DB
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.