These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19383506)

  • 1. On comparing a single case with a control sample: an alternative perspective.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2690-5. PubMed ID: 19383506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing a single case with a control sample: refinements and extensions.
    Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2687-9. PubMed ID: 19383504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing a single case with a control sample: correction and further comment.
    Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2696-7. PubMed ID: 19383507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-case research in neuropsychology: a comparison of five forms of t-test for comparing a case to controls.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):1009-16. PubMed ID: 21843884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximizing the power of comparing single cases against a control sample: an argument, a program for making comparisons, and a worked example from the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test.
    Hulleman J; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 24(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 18416492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferential methods for comparing a single case with a control sample: modified t-tests versus mycroft et al.'s (2002) modified anova.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC; Gray CD
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2004 Oct; 21(7):750-5. PubMed ID: 21038230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Porter S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 May; 27(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 20936548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-individual measures of association in neuropsychology: inferential methods for comparing a single case with a control or normative sample.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC; Venneri A
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Nov; 9(7):989-1000. PubMed ID: 14738281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing patients' predicted test scores from a regression equation with their obtained scores: a significance test and point estimate of abnormality with accompanying confidence limits.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2006 May; 20(3):259-71. PubMed ID: 16719619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing a single case to a control sample: testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Ryan K
    Cortex; 2011; 47(10):1166-78. PubMed ID: 21458788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferential methods for comparing two single cases.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Wood LT
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Jul; 27(5):377-400. PubMed ID: 21718213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a single case to a control or normative sample in neuropsychology: development of a Bayesian approach.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Jun; 24(4):343-72. PubMed ID: 18416496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of criteria for classical dissociations in single-case studies by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Sep; 19(5):664-78. PubMed ID: 16187885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
    MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of statistical procedures for comparing an individual's performance with that of a group of controls.
    Mycroft RH; Mitchell DC; Kay J
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2002 Jun; 19(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 20957541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multivariate normative comparisons.
    Huizenga HM; Smeding H; Grasman RP; Schmand B
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2534-42. PubMed ID: 17451757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Payne and Jones revisited: estimating the abnormality of test score differences using a modified paired samples t test.
    Crawford JR; Howell DC; Garthwaite PH
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 10484700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests of non-null hypothesis on proportions for stratified data.
    Zhao G
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(9):1429-46. PubMed ID: 17668916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing a single case to a control group - Applying linear mixed effects models to repeated measures data.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():148-59. PubMed ID: 26218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.