These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19383803)

  • 1. A methodology for improving throughput using portal monitors.
    Kramer GH; Capello K; Hauck B; Moodie G; DiNardo A; Burns L; Chiang A; Marro L; Brown J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jun; 134(3-4):152-8. PubMed ID: 19383803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considerations in screeneing/measuring children with internal/external contamination.
    Kramer GH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 20833679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of portable personnel portal monitors: potential problems when dealing with contaminated persons.
    Kramer GH; Capello K; Hauck BM; Brown JT
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 16966880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of two commercially available portal monitors for emergency response.
    Kramer GH; Capello K; Hauck BM
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2 Suppl):S50-6. PubMed ID: 17228189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential of modern technologies for improvement of in vivo calibration.
    Franck D; de Carlan L; Fisher H; Pierrat N; Schlagbauer M; Wahl W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):438-43. PubMed ID: 17337736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement of the measuring equipment used in the assessment of internal doses in emergency situations.
    Muikku M; Rahola T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):277-81. PubMed ID: 17556342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Portable Personnel Portal Monitors too sensitive?
    Kramer GH; Capello K; Hauck BM; Brown JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):249-52. PubMed ID: 17627949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HML's whole body counter: measuring highly radioactive persons.
    Kramer GH; Capello K; Chiang A; Hauck BM
    Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 19901599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation protection system at the RIKEN RI beam factory.
    Uwamino Y; Fujita S; Sakamoto H; Ito S; Fukunishi N; Yabutani T; Yamano T; Fukumura A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):279-83. PubMed ID: 16381729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement to whole-body counting procedures at nuclear power plants.
    Kong TY; Kim HG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jan; 133(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 19233891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of internal contamination hazard and fast monitoring for workers involved in maintenance operations on PET cyclotrons.
    Terranova N; Testoni R; Cicoria G; Mostacci D; Marengo M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):468-72. PubMed ID: 21051437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The whole-body counting facility at the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority after relocation.
    del Risco Norrlid L; Östergren I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):433-6. PubMed ID: 21127035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of voxel phantoms in whole-body counting for the validation of calibration phantoms and the assessment of uncertainties.
    de Carlan L; Roch P; Blanchardon E; Franck D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):477-82. PubMed ID: 17018545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Localization of activities in the human body with a whole-body counter.
    Fischer H; Schlagbauer M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):488-91. PubMed ID: 17327238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an automatic smear sampler and evaluation of surface contamination.
    Seo BK; Lee BJ; Lee KW; Park JH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 15280566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodology for worker neutron exposure evaluation in the PDCF facility design.
    Scherpelz RI; Traub RJ; Pryor KH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):725-9. PubMed ID: 15353738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The standfast whole body counter and the sliced BOMAB phantom: efficiency as a function of number of sources and energy modeled by MCNP5.
    Kramer GH; Capello K
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 17220718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical implications of procedures developed in IDEA project--comparison with traditional methods.
    Andrasi A; Bouvier C; Brandl A; de Carlan L; Fischer H; Franck D; Höllriegl V; Li WB; Oeh U; Ritt J; Roth P; Schlagbauer M; Schmitzer Ch; Wahl W; Zombori P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):456-9. PubMed ID: 17314089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk communication considerations to facilitate the screening of mass populations for potential contamination with radioactive material.
    Emery RJ; Sprau DD; Morecook RC
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5 Suppl):S168-74. PubMed ID: 18849710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workplace characterisation in case of rail transport of radioactive materials.
    Donadille L; Itié C; Lahaye T; Muller H; Trompier F; Bottollier-Depois JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17189278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.