303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19384003)
1. Experimental evaluation of a robust optimization method for IMRT of moving targets.
Vrancić C; Trofimov A; Chan TC; Sharp GC; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2901-14. PubMed ID: 19384003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of breathing motion on intensity modulated radiotherapy in the step-and-shoot technique: phantom measurements for irradiation of superficial target volumes.
Thilmann C; Häring P; Thilmann L; Unkelbach J; Rhein B; Nill S; Huber P; Janisch E; Thieke C; Debus J
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):N117-26. PubMed ID: 16510947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the effect of respiratory motion on lung tumour dosimetry with the aid of a breathing phantom with deforming lungs.
Nioutsikou E; Richard N Symonds-Tayler J; Bedford JL; Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3359-74. PubMed ID: 16825735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is ad-hoc plan adaptation based on 2-Step IMRT feasible?
Bratengeier K; Polat B; Gainey M; Grewenig P; Meyer J; Flentje M
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 19796833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated weekly replanning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervix cancer.
Stewart J; Lim K; Kelly V; Xie J; Brock KK; Moseley J; Cho YB; Fyles A; Lundin A; Rehbinder H; Löf J; Jaffray D; Milosevic M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Oct; 78(2):350-8. PubMed ID: 20832664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of interplay effects of scanned particle beams and moving targets.
Bert C; Grözinger SO; Rietzel E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2253-65. PubMed ID: 18401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation and prediction of the effect of respiratory motion on whole breast radiation therapy dose distributions.
Cao J; Roeske JC; Chmura SJ; Salama JK; Shoushtari AN; Boyer AL; Martel MK
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 19410141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robust optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning under uncertainty.
Chu M; Zinchenko Y; Henderson SG; Sharpe MB
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5463-77. PubMed ID: 16306645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A robust approach to IMRT optimization.
Chan TC; Bortfeld T; Tsitsiklis JN
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2567-83. PubMed ID: 16675870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique.
Verellen D; Tournel K; Linthout N; Soete G; Wauters T; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 16533540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
