These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19384017)
1. Likelihood ratios: clinical application in day-to-day practice. Parikh R; Parikh S; Arun E; Thomas R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009; 57(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 19384017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Importance of Conditional Probability in Diagnostic Reasoning and Clinical Decision Making: A Primer for the Eye Care Practitioner. Sanfilippo PG; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):81-89. PubMed ID: 28102752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles. Weissler AM Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How should results from clinical tests be integrated into the diagnostic process? Garway-Heath DF; Friedman DS Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1479-80. PubMed ID: 16949440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios. Bowden SC; Loring DW J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. B-scan ultrasonography to screen for retinal tears in acute symptomatic age-related posterior vitreous detachment. Lorenzo-Carrero J; Perez-Flores I; Cid-Galano M; Fernandez-Fernandez M; Heras-Raposo F; Vazquez-Nuñez R; Lopez-Fuentes M Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 19010551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic tests: understanding results, assessing utility, and predicting performance. Labrique AB; Pan WK Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 149(6):878-881.e2. PubMed ID: 20510686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis. Asukata Y; Ishihara M; Hasumi Y; Nakamura S; Hayashi K; Ohno S; Mizuki N Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2008; 16(3):77-81. PubMed ID: 18569792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios. Gallagher EJ Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applications of the polymerase chain reaction in clinical ophthalmology. Yeung SN; Butler A; Mackenzie PJ Can J Ophthalmol; 2009 Feb; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19169309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [KOWA VX-10i--intelligent imaging in ophthalmology]. Grigoriu F; Simionescu R; Ghiţă M; Voinea L Oftalmologia; 2010; 54(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 21137187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 2). Clinical application and usefulness of a diagnostic test]. Cifuentes L; Cerda J Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Aug; 27(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 21046715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the Negative Likelihood Ratio and How It Can Be Used to Minimize False-Positives in Breast Imaging. Yang WT; Parikh JR; Stavros AT; Otto P; Maislin G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):301-306. PubMed ID: 29166150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Low use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of the ocular surface]. Rivas L Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2006 Sep; 81(9):499-500. PubMed ID: 17016781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Joint estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs--application in ophthalmology. de Leon AR; Soo A; Bonzo DC; Rudnisky CJ Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):837-50. PubMed ID: 19697307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propagation of uncertainty in Bayesian diagnostic test interpretation. Srinivasan P; Westover MB; Bianchi MT South Med J; 2012 Sep; 105(9):452-9. PubMed ID: 22948322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalized likelihood ratios for quantitative diagnostic test scores. Tandberg D; Deely JJ; O'Malley AJ Am J Emerg Med; 1997 Nov; 15(7):694-9. PubMed ID: 9375556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Parikh R; Mathai A; Parikh S; Chandra Sekhar G; Thomas R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2008; 56(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 18158403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust likelihood inference for diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs. Tsou TS Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 30203723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]