BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19384690)

  • 1. Optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs for Phase II oncology trials.
    Sun LZ; Chen C; Patel K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 19384690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient algorithm to determine the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in oncology clinical trials.
    Zhang Y; Mietlowski W; Chen B; Wang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21191854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A two-stage phase II trial design utilizing both primary and secondary endpoints.
    Lin X; Allred R; Andrews G
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 17252536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
    Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal designs for two-arm, phase II clinical trial design with multiple constraints.
    Mayo MS; Mahnken JD; Soong SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):106-24. PubMed ID: 20077252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exact two-stage designs for phase II activity trials with rank-based endpoints.
    Wilding GE; Shan G; Hutson AD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Mar; 33(2):332-41. PubMed ID: 22074983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized two-stage Phase II clinical trial designs based on Barnard's exact test.
    Shan G; Ma C; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23957517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
    Farley J; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the wrong hypothesis in phase II oncology trials: there is a better alternative.
    Ratain MJ; Karrison TG
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 13(3):781-2. PubMed ID: 17289865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Curtailed two-stage designs with two dependent binary endpoints.
    Chen CM; Chi Y
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 22162348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-stage k-sample designs for the ordered alternative problem.
    Shan G; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 22408050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Newer phase II trial designs gaining ground.
    Benowitz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1428-9. PubMed ID: 17895467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.
    Adjei AA; Christian M; Ivy P
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1866-72. PubMed ID: 19276272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of secondary endpoints in two-stage phase II oncology trials.
    Kunz CU; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4352-68. PubMed ID: 22930470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.