BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19386098)

  • 21. Evaluation of microarray preprocessing algorithms based on concordance with RT-PCR in clinical samples.
    Gyorffy B; Molnar B; Lage H; Szallasi Z; Eklund AC
    PLoS One; 2009 May; 4(5):e5645. PubMed ID: 19461970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments via statistic synthesis.
    Yang YH; Xiao Y; Segal MR
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1084-93. PubMed ID: 15513985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microarray data analysis: a practical approach for selecting differentially expressed genes.
    Mutch DM; Berger A; Mansourian R; Rytz A; Roberts MA
    Genome Biol; 2001; 2(12):PREPRINT0009. PubMed ID: 11790248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. mu-CS: an extension of the TM4 platform to manage Affymetrix binary data.
    Guzzi PH; Cannataro M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():315. PubMed ID: 20537149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data.
    Boareto M; Caticha N
    Microarrays (Basel); 2014 Dec; 3(4):340-51. PubMed ID: 27600352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gene set enrichment meta-learning analysis: next- generation sequencing versus microarrays.
    Stiglic G; Bajgot M; Kokol P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11():176. PubMed ID: 20377890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?
    Zyla J; Marczyk M; Weiner J; Polanska J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 28499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of probe level patterns in Affymetrix microarray data.
    Cambon AC; Khalyfa A; Cooper NG; Thompson CM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():146. PubMed ID: 17480226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Empirical Bayes models for multiple probe type microarrays at the probe level.
    Astrand M; Mostad P; Rudemo M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():156. PubMed ID: 18366694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GeneCompete: an integrative tool of a novel union algorithm with various ranking techniques for multiple gene expression data.
    Janyasupab P; Suratanee A; Plaimas K
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1686. PubMed ID: 38077583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rank-based methods as a non-parametric alternative of the T-statistic for the analysis of biological microarray data.
    Breitling R; Herzyk P
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 3(5):1171-89. PubMed ID: 16278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application.
    Li C; Hung Wong W
    Genome Biol; 2001; 2(8):RESEARCH0032. PubMed ID: 11532216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of High-Level Microarray Analysis Methods in the Context of Result Consistency.
    Chrominski K; Tkacz M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128845. PubMed ID: 26057385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finding differentially expressed genes in two-channel DNA microarray datasets: how to increase reliability of data preprocessing.
    Rotter A; Hren M; Baebler S; Blejec A; Gruden K
    OMICS; 2008 Sep; 12(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 18771401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assessment of the Affymetrix U133A&B probesets by target sequence mapping and expression data analysis.
    Orlov YL; Zhou J; Lipovich L; Shahab A; Kuznetsov VA
    In Silico Biol; 2007; 7(3):241-60. PubMed ID: 18415975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A non-parametric meta-analysis approach for combining independent microarray datasets: application using two microarray datasets pertaining to chronic allograft nephropathy.
    Kong X; Mas V; Archer KJ
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Feb; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18302764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Hong F; Breitling R
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 18204063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new method for class prediction based on signed-rank algorithms applied to Affymetrix microarray experiments.
    Rème T; Hose D; De Vos J; Vassal A; Poulain PO; Pantesco V; Goldschmidt H; Klein B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18190711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.