These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

880 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19387164)

  • 1. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
    Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
    Small KH; Tepper OM; Unger JG; Kumar N; Feldman DL; Choi M; Karp NS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 19091641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.
    Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty.
    Choi M; Unger J; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Feldman D; Karp N
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 19387153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining pseudoptosis (bottoming out) 3 years after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction.
    Quan M; Fadl A; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 21082180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
    Pitanguy I; Vaena M; Radwanski HN; Nunes D; Vargas AF
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty.
    Esme DL; Bucksch A; Beekman WH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18982384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Unilateral Implant or Autologous Breast Reconstruction Better in Obtaining Breast Symmetry?
    Cohen O; Small K; Lee C; Petruolo O; Karp N; Choi M
    Breast J; 2016; 22(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 26534828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
    Ceydeli A; Freund RM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome.
    Gladilin E; Gabrielova B; Montemurro P; Hedén P
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 21184065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
    Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between scoliosis and breast asymmetries in women undergoing augmentation mammaplasty.
    Tsai FC; Hsieh MS; Liao CK; Wu ST
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 20383498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The stable status evaluation for female breast implant surgery by calculating related physics parameters.
    Sun SP; Hsu KW; Chen JS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 May; 90(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 18164780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wise-pattern breast reconstruction: modification using AlloDerm and a vascularized dermal-subcutaneous pedicle.
    Derderian CA; Karp NS; Choi M
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):528-32. PubMed ID: 19387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty.
    Pelle-Ceravolo M; Del Vescovo A; Bertozzi E; Molinari P
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 15666044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L; Ramírez-Macías R; ; ; ; ; ;
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 16404648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.