882 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19387164)
1. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
Small KH; Tepper OM; Unger JG; Kumar N; Feldman DL; Choi M; Karp NS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 19091641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.
Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty.
Choi M; Unger J; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Feldman D; Karp N
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 19387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining pseudoptosis (bottoming out) 3 years after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction.
Quan M; Fadl A; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 21082180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
Pitanguy I; Vaena M; Radwanski HN; Nunes D; Vargas AF
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty.
Esme DL; Bucksch A; Beekman WH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18982384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Unilateral Implant or Autologous Breast Reconstruction Better in Obtaining Breast Symmetry?
Cohen O; Small K; Lee C; Petruolo O; Karp N; Choi M
Breast J; 2016; 22(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 26534828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
Ceydeli A; Freund RM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome.
Gladilin E; Gabrielova B; Montemurro P; Hedén P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 21184065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between scoliosis and breast asymmetries in women undergoing augmentation mammaplasty.
Tsai FC; Hsieh MS; Liao CK; Wu ST
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 20383498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The stable status evaluation for female breast implant surgery by calculating related physics parameters.
Sun SP; Hsu KW; Chen JS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 May; 90(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 18164780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wise-pattern breast reconstruction: modification using AlloDerm and a vascularized dermal-subcutaneous pedicle.
Derderian CA; Karp NS; Choi M
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):528-32. PubMed ID: 19387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
Góes JC; Landecker A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty.
Pelle-Ceravolo M; Del Vescovo A; Bertozzi E; Molinari P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 15666044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique.
Cárdenas-Camarena L; Ramírez-Macías R; ; ; ; ; ;
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 16404648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
