445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19388486)
1. Opening stem cell research and development: a policy proposal for the management of data, intellectual property, and ethics.
Winickoff DE; Saha K; Graff GD
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9(1):52-127. PubMed ID: 19388486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem cell research: the bigger picture.
Dresser R
Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 15834191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical issues and approaches in stem cell research: from international insights to a proposal.
Vicini A
J Soc Christ Ethics; 2003; 23(1):71-98. PubMed ID: 15856599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments on "Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research".
Byrnes WM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Jun; 19(2):202-5; discussion 206-9. PubMed ID: 19623825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The promise and peril of embryonic stem cell research: a call for vigilant oversight.
Frist B
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 167-76. PubMed ID: 12664942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver.
Levine RJ
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research.
Majumder MA; Cohen CB
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond the low-hanging fruit: stem cell research policy in an Obama administration.
Fosset JW
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():523-51. PubMed ID: 19757719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Stem cells and ethics: the new law proposal is not extensive enough].
Gammelgaard A; Rossel P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jul; 165(28):2830-3. PubMed ID: 12891908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Governing stem cell research in California and the USA: towards a social infrastructure.
Winickoff DE
Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):390-4. PubMed ID: 16843559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem cell research: the fallacy in Bush's position.
Singer P
N J Med; 2004 Dec; 101(12):14-7. PubMed ID: 15730078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The once and future debate on human embryonic stem cell research.
Latham SR
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():483-94. PubMed ID: 19757716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stem cells: the veto of George W. Bush].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2006 Aug; 2(75):1867. PubMed ID: 16948424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science and law. Intellectual property and human embryonic stem cell research.
Loring JF; Campbell C
Science; 2006 Mar; 311(5768):1716-7. PubMed ID: 16556826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Election 2006. Stem cell supporters hail results, but political lessons aren't clear.
Kintisch E
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1062-3. PubMed ID: 17110542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
Holden C; Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comments on " Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research".
Furton EJ
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Jun; 19(2):205-6; discussion 206-9. PubMed ID: 19623826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The embryonic stem cell research agenda in France].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2007 Dec; 3(138):2921. PubMed ID: 18277770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The paths around stem cell intellectual property.
Taymor KS; Scott CT; Greely HT
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):411-3. PubMed ID: 16601720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
