BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19389980)

  • 1. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele.
    Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superiority of QTL-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Abdel-Azim G; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jul; 85(7):1869-80. PubMed ID: 12201538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Spelman RJ; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 9839238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporation of discrete genotype effects for multiple genes into animal model evaluations when only a small fraction of the population has been genotyped.
    Baruch E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4365-71. PubMed ID: 18946142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection on multiple QTL with control of gene diversity and inbreeding for long-term benefit.
    Li Y; Kadarmideen HN; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Oct; 125(5):320-9. PubMed ID: 18803787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of including a quantitative trait locus in selection under different waiting plans of young bulls.
    Abdel-Azim G; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Feb; 86(2):667-76. PubMed ID: 12647973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marker-assisted selection for a sex-limited character in a nucleus breeding population.
    Ruane J; Colleau JJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Sep; 79(9):1666-78. PubMed ID: 8899535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic impacts of using female-sorted semen in commercial and nucleus herds.
    Abdel-Azim G; Schnell S
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1554-63. PubMed ID: 17297129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for continual application of marker-assisted selection in an open nucleus population.
    Stella A; Lohuis MM; Pagnacco G; Jansen GB
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Sep; 85(9):2358-67. PubMed ID: 12362469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.