These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19389993)

  • 1. Alternatives for examining daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2348-55. PubMed ID: 19389993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timeliness and effectiveness of progeny testing through artificial insemination.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wright JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1513-25. PubMed ID: 12741578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of foreign dairy bull evaluations in predicting United States evaluations for yield.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2621-6. PubMed ID: 15328287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heritability of changes in genetic evaluations of dairy bulls from first to later records of daughters.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 12018441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of national and regional sire evaluations in predicting future-daughter milk yield.
    Norman HD; Vanraden PM; Powell RL; Wright JR; Verboort WR
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Feb; 88(2):812-26. PubMed ID: 15653549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency of maturity rate for milk yield across countries and generations.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; VanRaden PM; Miglior F; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3937-44. PubMed ID: 17639005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Merit of outliers for milk yield as indicators of accuracy of genetic evaluations of sires.
    Meinert TR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2951-5. PubMed ID: 9839239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of more frequent genetic evaluations for dairy bulls.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2766-70. PubMed ID: 10629824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of variance of interaction effects of sire and herd on selection for milk and fat yield.
    Dimov G; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jan; 79(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 8675777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Progeny testing and selection intensity for Holstein bulls in different countries.
    Powell RL; Norman HD; Sanders AH
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Oct; 86(10):3386-93. PubMed ID: 14594259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences of progeny test programs on genetic evaluations of young sires.
    Vierhout CN; Cassell BG; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Sep; 81(9):2524-32. PubMed ID: 9785245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing international comparisons of dairy sires.
    Schaeffer LR; Reents R; Jamrozik J
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jun; 79(6):1108-16. PubMed ID: 8827476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between individual herd-heritability estimates and sire misidentification rate.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD; Zwald NR; Cowan CM; Meland OM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1640-7. PubMed ID: 18349256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of multinational data to improve national evaluations of Holstein bulls.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Aug; 81(8):2257-63. PubMed ID: 9749392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of correction for heterogeneity of variance on bias and accuracy of breeding value estimation for Dutch dairy cattle.
    van der Werf JH; Meuwissen TH; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3174-84. PubMed ID: 7836606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.