278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19390012)
1. Scientific misconduct. Science retracts discredited paper; bitter patent dispute continues.
Normile D
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):450-1. PubMed ID: 19390012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hwang work granted patent.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7213):571. PubMed ID: 18833236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical journal retracts paper over falsified data.
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):266. PubMed ID: 12124591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH laboratory admits to fabricated embryo research, retracts paper.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):427. PubMed ID: 1608434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal developments and practical implications of gene patenting on targeted drug discovery and development.
Klein RD
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Jun; 87(6):633-5. PubMed ID: 20485317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nature group journal retracts two papers after cancer researcher was found to have falsified data.
Siva N
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5218. PubMed ID: 21844161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Two papers from Korean lab found to lack 'scientific truth'.
Couzin J; Normile D
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5869):1468-9. PubMed ID: 18339906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Breach of trust: events in South Korea have highlighted a deep-seated problem.
New Sci; 2005 Dec 24-2006 Jan 6; 188(2531-2532):3. PubMed ID: 16459434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Charges fly in $1bn hormone patent battle.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):289. PubMed ID: 10360558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Need for a court to rule on patents and misconduct.
Bihain BE
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):875. PubMed ID: 12931157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intellectual property. U.S. patent reform begins long journey through Congress.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1725-6. PubMed ID: 15961638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intellectual property. U.S. Patent Office casts doubt on Wisconsin stem cell patents.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):182. PubMed ID: 17431141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Don't rush to rehabilitate Hwang.
Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7484):453. PubMed ID: 24459716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clearing a path through the patent thicket.
Holman C
Cell; 2006 May; 125(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 16713553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lancet retracts paper by disgraced Canadian researcher.
White C
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i665. PubMed ID: 26837537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
