242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19390173)
21. Clinical perspective on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation, the University of Iowa experience.
Gantz BJ; Hansen M; Dunn CC
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108487. PubMed ID: 35410721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.
Zhang T; Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Saoji A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 23075632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
McDermott H; Henshall K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nucleus Hybrid S12: Multicenter Clinical Trial Results.
Dunn CC; Oleson J; Parkinson A; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ
Laryngoscope; 2020 Oct; 130(10):E548-E558. PubMed ID: 32212342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children.
Park LR; Teagle HFB; Gagnon E; Woodard J; Brown KD
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 30252685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Kong YY; Stickney GS; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15807023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hearing loss and the limits of amplification.
Turner CW
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():2-5. PubMed ID: 17063003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
Zhang T; Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 19915474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.
Turner CW; Gantz BJ; Vidal C; Behrens A; Henry BA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15101651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.
Kiefer J; Pok M; Adunka O; Stürzebecher E; Baumgartner W; Schmidt M; Tillein J; Ye Q; Gstoettner W
Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 15724084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing.
Gifford RH; Dorman MF; McKarns SA; Spahr AJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):835-43. PubMed ID: 17675589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
Yoon YS; Whitaker G; Lee YS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):521-527. PubMed ID: 34965598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
