269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19391102)
1. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cynthia J. Najdowski: Psi Chi/APA Edwin B. Newman Graduate Research Award.
Am Psychol; 2012 Nov; 67(8):691-3. PubMed ID: 23163461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of juveniles' ages and levels of psychosocial maturity on judges' opinions about adjudicative competence.
Cox JM; Goldstein NE; Dolores J; Zelechoski AD; Messenheimer S
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22471382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
Semple JK; Woody WD
Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
Woody WD; Forrest KD
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competency to stand trial in family court: characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles.
McKee GR; Shea SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 10212027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Competency to stand trial in preadjudicated and petitioned juvenile defendants.
Baerger DR; Griffin EF; Lyons JS; Simmons R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 14584530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
