313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19391631)
1. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs.
Corbeil CR; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 19391631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 1. Development and validation of FITTED 1.0.
Corbeil CR; Englebienne P; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 17305329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
Jones G; Willett P; Glen RC; Leach AR; Taylor R
J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(3):727-48. PubMed ID: 9126849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
Huang SY; Zou X
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 4. Are popular scoring functions accurate for this class of proteins?
Englebienne P; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1568-80. PubMed ID: 19445499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking.
Thomsen R; Christensen MH
J Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 49(11):3315-21. PubMed ID: 16722650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.
Lie MA; Thomsen R; Pedersen CN; Schiøtt B; Christensen MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 21452852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.
Plewczynski D; Łaźniewski M; Augustyniak R; Ginalski K
J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar; 32(4):742-55. PubMed ID: 20812323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SODOCK: swarm optimization for highly flexible protein-ligand docking.
Chen HM; Liu BF; Huang HL; Hwang SF; Ho SY
J Comput Chem; 2007 Jan; 28(2):612-23. PubMed ID: 17186483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.
Roberts BC; Mancera RL
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 18211049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FLIPDock: docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors.
Zhao Y; Sanner MF
Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(3):726-37. PubMed ID: 17523154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand.
Mizutani MY; Tomioka N; Itai A
J Mol Biol; 1994 Oct; 243(2):310-26. PubMed ID: 7932757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binding mode prediction of cytochrome p450 and thymidine kinase protein-ligand complexes by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking.
de Graaf C; Pospisil P; Pos W; Folkers G; Vermeulen NP
J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2308-18. PubMed ID: 15801824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions.
Rarey M; Kramer B; Lengauer T
Proteins; 1999 Jan; 34(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 10336380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detailed comparison of the protein-ligand docking efficiencies of GOLD, a commercial package and ArgusLab, a licensable freeware.
Joy S; Nair PS; Hariharan R; Pillai MR
In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17518767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
