These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19391896)

  • 1. Quantum fidelity and thermal phase transitions.
    Quan HT; Cucchietti FM
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Mar; 79(3 Pt 1):031101. PubMed ID: 19391896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced fidelity susceptibility and its finite-size scaling behaviors in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Ma J; Xu L; Xiong HN; Wang X
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):051126. PubMed ID: 19113114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantum criticality of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in terms of fidelity susceptibility.
    Kwok HM; Ning WQ; Gu SJ; Lin HQ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):032103. PubMed ID: 18851088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scaling behavior for a class of quantum phase transitions.
    Wang WG; Qin P; Wang Q; Benenti G; Casati G
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Aug; 86(2 Pt 1):021124. PubMed ID: 23005739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global quantum discord in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model at zero and finite temperatures.
    Bao J; Liu YH; Guo B
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2021 Sep; 33(49):. PubMed ID: 34517354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model: Static aspects.
    Gamito J; Khalouf-Rivera J; Arias JM; Pérez-Fernández P; Pérez-Bernal F
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Oct; 106(4-1):044125. PubMed ID: 36397542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantum phase transitions in networks of Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models.
    Sorokin AV; Bastidas VM; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(4):042141. PubMed ID: 25375472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the dissipative Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model with proposed realization in optical cavity QED.
    Morrison S; Parkins AS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Feb; 100(4):040403. PubMed ID: 18352244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ac-Driven quantum phase transition in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Engelhardt G; Bastidas VM; Emary C; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 May; 87(5):052110. PubMed ID: 23767490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Excited-state quantum phase transitions in Dicke superradiance models.
    Brandes T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Sep; 88(3):032133. PubMed ID: 24125239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many-body reduced fidelity susceptibility in Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Ma J; Wang X; Gu SJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Aug; 80(2 Pt 1):021124. PubMed ID: 19792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exceptional points near first- and second-order quantum phase transitions.
    Stránský P; Dvořák M; Cejnar P
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012112. PubMed ID: 29448346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Macroscopic distinguishability between quantum states defining different phases of matter: fidelity and the Uhlmann geometric phase.
    Paunković N; Rocha Vieira V
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Jan; 77(1 Pt 1):011129. PubMed ID: 18351840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New dynamical scaling universality for quantum networks across adiabatic quantum phase transitions.
    Acevedo OL; Quiroga L; Rodríguez FJ; Johnson NF
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Jan; 112(3):030403. PubMed ID: 24484124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiclassical bifurcations and topological phase transitions in a one-dimensional lattice of coupled Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models.
    Sorokin AV; Aparicio Alcalde M; Bastidas VM; Engelhardt G; Angelakis DG; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E; 2016 Sep; 94(3-1):032123. PubMed ID: 27739785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to perturbations and quantum phase transitions.
    Wisniacki DA; Roncaglia AJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 May; 87(5):050902. PubMed ID: 23767477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting Out-of-Time-Order Correlations via Quasiadiabatic Echoes as a Tool to Reveal Quantum Coherence in Equilibrium Quantum Phase Transitions.
    Lewis-Swan RJ; Muleady SR; Rey AM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Dec; 125(24):240605. PubMed ID: 33412057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Excited-state quantum phase transitions and the entropy of the work distribution in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Zhang H; Qian Y; Niu ZX; Wang Q
    Phys Rev E; 2024 Jun; 109(6-1):064110. PubMed ID: 39021010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of fidelity at magnetic quantum phase transitions.
    Schwandt D; Alet F; Capponi S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Oct; 103(17):170501. PubMed ID: 19905737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of mixed permutation symmetry sectors in the thermodynamic limit of critical three-level Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick atom models.
    Calixto M; Mayorgas A; Guerrero J
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012116. PubMed ID: 33601600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.