These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19393127)

  • 1. Breeding without breeding.
    El-Kassaby YA; Lstibůrek M
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Apr; 91(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 19393127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Axiom SNP genotyping array for Douglas-fir.
    Howe GT; Jayawickrama K; Kolpak SE; Kling J; Trappe M; Hipkins V; Ye T; Guida S; Cronn R; Cushman SA; McEvoy S
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 31900111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of inbreeding on coastal Douglas fir growth and yield in operational plantations: a model-based approach.
    Wang T; Aitken SN; Woods JH; Polsson K; Magnussen S
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Apr; 108(6):1162-71. PubMed ID: 15067403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding?
    El-Kassaby YA; Cappa EP; Liewlaksaneeyanawin C; Klápště J; Lstibůrek M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25737. PubMed ID: 21991342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective selection of elite parent trees using paternity testing with microsatellite markers: an alternative short term breeding tactic for Eucalyptus.
    Grattapaglia D; Ribeiro VJ; Rezende GD
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Jun; 109(1):192-9. PubMed ID: 15004676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metabolite profiling of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) field trials reveals strong environmental and weak genetic variation.
    Robinson AR; Ukrainetz NK; Kang KY; Mansfield SD
    New Phytol; 2007; 174(4):762-773. PubMed ID: 17504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a theory of marker-assisted gene pyramiding.
    Servin B; Martin OC; Mézard M; Hospital F
    Genetics; 2004 Sep; 168(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 15454561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of mid-parent values and progeny tests to increase the efficiency of potato breeding for combined processing quality and disease and pest resistance.
    Bradshaw JE; Dale MF; Mackay GR
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Jun; 107(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12835930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir.
    Thistlethwaite FR; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; Stoehr MU; El-Kassaby YA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Jun; 122(6):848-863. PubMed ID: 30631145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genealogical relationship among members of selection and production populations of yellow cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis [D. Don] Oerst.) in the absence of parental information.
    Massah N; Wang J; Russell JH; Van Niejenhuis A; El-Kassaby YA
    J Hered; 2010; 101(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 19945992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
    Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Traditional and modern plant breeding methods with examples in rice (Oryza sativa L.).
    Breseghello F; Coelho AS
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8277-86. PubMed ID: 23551250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new versatile database created for geneticists and breeders to link molecular and phenotypic data in perennial crops: the AppleBreed DataBase.
    Antofie A; Lateur M; Oger R; Patocchi A; Durel CE; Van de Weg WE
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):882-91. PubMed ID: 17237037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development.
    Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1252-6. PubMed ID: 12928779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Climate-related genetic variation in drought-resistance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii).
    Bansal S; Harrington CA; Gould PJ; St Clair JB
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Feb; 21(2):947-58. PubMed ID: 25156589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assortative mating: I. Equal distribution of testing efforts.
    Lstibůrek M; Mullin TJ; Lindgren D; Rosvall O
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Oct; 109(6):1196-1203. PubMed ID: 15278282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Possible uses of genetic markers for improving fertility and health in swine production].
    Steinheuer R; Drögemüller C; Hamann H; Distl O
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jun; 110(6):255-65. PubMed ID: 12866259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.