455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19393881)
1. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
Durrie DS; Kezirian GM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap thickness accuracy.
Lipstock K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):363-4; author reply 364. PubMed ID: 20152639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis.
Pfaeffl WA; Kunze M; Zenk U; Pfaeffl MB; Schuster T; Lohmann C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1872-80. PubMed ID: 19006732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.
Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.
Güell JL; Velasco F; Roberts C; Sisquella MT; Mahmoud A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15721703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous monitoring of corneal thickness changes during LASIK with online optical coherence pachymetry.
Wirbelauer C; Pham DT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2559-68. PubMed ID: 15617925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Murakami Y; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1879-83. PubMed ID: 21840682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.
Hu MY; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD; Bowman RW; Verity SM; Mootha VV; Petroll WM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 17397742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome.
Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dry eyes and corneal sensation after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser flap creation Effect of hinge position, hinge angle, and flap thickness.
Mian SI; Li AY; Dutta S; Musch DC; Shtein RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2092-8. PubMed ID: 19969213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vryghem JC; Devogelaere T; Stodulka P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 20202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
