BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19393887)

  • 1. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery.
    Park YG; Chung SH; Joo CK
    Ophthalmologica; 2012; 227(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21832823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.
    Vasavada V; Vasavada V; Raj SM; Vasavada AR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17531697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.
    Can I; Takmaz T; Yildiz Y; Bayhan HA; Soyugelen G; Bostanci B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 20457364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery with the bevel-down technique.
    Kim EK; Jo KJ; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2028-33. PubMed ID: 21907535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study.
    Cavallini GM; Campi L; Masini C; Pelloni S; Pupino A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 17321387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of aqualase and phacoemulsification on the corneal endothelium.
    Hu V; Hughes EH; Patel N; Whitefield LA
    Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 20098310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical application of a Scheimpflug system for lens density measurements in phacoemulsification.
    Kim JS; Chung SH; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1204-9. PubMed ID: 19545809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
    Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
    Dosso AA; Cottet L; Burgener ND; Di Nardo S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens.
    Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Fujishima H; Yagi Y; Tsubota K; Kojima T; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Yagi Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 15050249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incision integrity and postoperative outcomes after microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed using 2 incision-dependent systems.
    Vasavada V; Vasavada AR; Vasavada VA; Srivastava S; Gajjar DU; Mehta S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 23411098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.